New Delhi – Indian authorities have issued notices to messaging platforms Telegram and Signal, questioning their existing username features. This move follows a similar notice sent to WhatsApp earlier this week. The government is raising concerns that these features, which allow users to connect without sharing phone numbers, could facilitate fraud and impersonation.
The notices, reportedly from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeITy), seek explanations from Telegram and Signal on why their username functionalities should continue to be permitted. These actions signify an escalation of India's regulatory scrutiny over online platforms, particularly concerning features that enable anonymity.
Concerns articulated by the government and some experts center on the potential for increased online fraud, phishing, and impersonation attacks due to the ability to communicate via usernames without revealing personal phone numbers. This mirrors the objections raised against WhatsApp's planned username feature, which the company was asked to pause.
Read More: Git-annex removes AI code to ensure software safety
While WhatsApp has publicly defended its upcoming feature by highlighting built-in safeguards and clarifications, spokespersons for Telegram and Signal have not yet offered immediate comment. The issue of usernames on Telegram is particularly relevant as the platform already possesses such a feature, which has been operational. Signal's inclusion in the notices is noted as particularly concerning by some observers.
This regulatory push occurs amidst a backdrop of recent government actions, including a temporary ban on Telegram over alleged issues related to leaked exam papers. The ban was lifted after the relevant examinations concluded.
The government's stance appears to be a broad assessment of how platforms are addressing safety and fraud mitigation, with the potential for similar actions against other platforms with comparable features. The stated goal is to understand the existing measures and justifications for these anonymity-enhancing functionalities.
Read More: Supreme Court: ITRs Now Set Motor Accident Payouts
