A new 10% global tariff has been announced by Donald Trump, following a Supreme Court decision that struck down his previous tariff policies. The announcement came with strong criticism of the court's ruling, which Trump described as "deeply disappointing." This move signifies a shift in how Trump plans to implement trade measures, exploring different legal avenues to impose import taxes.

Background and Supreme Court Decision
The core of the issue revolves around Trump's use of executive power to impose tariffs. His administration had used statutes such as Section 232 and Section 301 to enact tariffs, aiming to protect American industries and rebuild the manufacturing base.

Previous Tariffs: Tariffs imposed under specific statutes, like Section 301, were subject to a 150-day limit, requiring congressional approval for extensions.
Supreme Court Ruling: The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, invalidated the legal basis for many of these tariffs. This ruling affirmed that unilateral presidential power to impose import taxes has limitations, particularly concerning their duration and the need for legislative consent for extensions.
Impact of Ruling: The decision was seen as a significant setback to Trump's economic agenda, limiting his ability to unilaterally implement broad tariff policies.
Trump's Response and New Tariff Announcement
In response to the court's decision, Trump expressed strong dissatisfaction and announced plans for new tariff measures.

Criticism of the Court: Trump openly criticized the justices, including some he nominated, for their role in the ruling. He specifically praised Justices Alito, Thomas, and Kavanaugh, who dissented in the case.
New Tariff Order: Trump stated his intention to sign an executive order imposing a 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. This action is framed as being "over and above our normal tariffs already being charged."
Legal Basis: Section 122 authorizes the President to impose temporary import surcharges for up to 150 days in specific international economic situations, such as balance-of-payments problems.
Further Investigations: Beyond the new global tariff, Trump indicated that investigations under Section 301 and other statutes would be initiated to address unfair trade practices by other countries and companies.
Economic Ramifications
The announcement of new tariffs has generated a mixed reaction and raises questions about economic stability.
Read More: Supreme Court Stops Trump Tariffs, Causing Fights in Republican Party on Friday

Market Reaction: Initial market responses indicated volatility, with futures for major stock indexes like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 showing declines following the announcement.
Previous Revenue: It is noted that Trump's earlier tariffs had significantly increased U.S. customs duties, with collections surging from under $10 billion to over $34 billion in a specific period. Firms that paid these duties may seek refunds.
Potential for New Tariffs: Trump stated that firms could face higher rates, with examples like Japan at 24%, South Korea at 25%, and China at 34% being mentioned. However, some nations, such as Canada, appeared to be exempt from the new levies.
Conflicting Views and Perspectives
The implications of Trump's actions and the Supreme Court's decision have elicited varied responses.
Unilateral Presidential Power
Trump's Stance: Trump has asserted broad executive authority, stating, "We have the right to do pretty much what we want to do." He views these tariffs as essential for the U.S. economy and for bolstering domestic manufacturing.
Judicial Interpretation: The Supreme Court's ruling suggests a more constrained view of unilateral presidential power in imposing tariffs, emphasizing the need for checks and balances, particularly for prolonged measures.
Congressional Role: The ruling implies a greater role for Congress in approving or extending tariffs beyond the initial statutory limits.
Economic Policy Objectives
Arguments for Tariffs: Proponents, including Trump, argue that tariffs are necessary to protect American jobs, counter unfair trade practices, and rebuild domestic industries. The increase in customs duties from previous tariffs is cited as evidence of their revenue-generating potential.
Arguments Against Tariffs: Critics and market observers often point to potential negative consequences, such as increased costs for consumers, disruptions to supply chains, retaliatory tariffs from other nations, and overall economic uncertainty. The stock market's initial negative reaction suggests investor concerns.
Expert Analysis and Future Considerations
The situation presents a complex interplay between executive action, judicial review, and economic policy.
William Bain, head of trade policy at the BCC, suggested that Trump could utilize "other legislation to re-impose tariffs," aligning with the recent announcement of using Section 122.
The validity and duration of the new Section 122 tariffs will likely be subject to scrutiny, especially if they exceed the 150-day limit without further legislative action.
The extent to which Trump will pursue additional investigations under Section 301 and other statutes remains a point of interest, potentially leading to further trade disputes.
Conclusion
The announcement of a new 10% global tariff by Donald Trump, following the Supreme Court's decision against his previous tariff policies, marks a significant development in U.S. trade strategy. Trump is utilizing Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to implement these new measures, which he describes as temporary surcharges. This move, coupled with stated intentions to pursue further trade investigations, underscores a persistent effort to employ tariffs as a tool of economic policy, despite judicial setbacks. The long-term economic impact, including potential international reactions and domestic market adjustments, remains to be fully observed.
Sources Used:
BBC News: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c0l9r67drg7t - Provided details on previous tariff revenue surges and general announcement.
CNBC: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/20/trump-global-trade-tariff-supreme-court.html?msockid=03f4d392d46561f01815c494d5916005 - Detailed Trump's assertion of executive rights, intention to bypass Congress, and the specific statutes involved (Sections 232 and 301).
Evening Standard: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/donald-trump-uk-trade-us-tariffs-ruling-supreme-court-b1271882.html - Covered Trump's announcement and mentioned the possibility of using other legislation, referencing the "reciprocal levies policy."
Los Angeles Times: https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2026-02-20/trump-lashes-out-at-justices-announces-new-10-global-tariff - Highlighted Trump's criticism of justices and his stated intention to use trade powers differently after the ruling.
AP News: https://apnews.com/live/supreme-court-tariff-ruling-updates - Reported Trump's intention to sign an executive order and the Supreme Court's decision, noting that Trump still has other tariff options.
Hindustan Times: https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/trump-announces-new-10-global-tariff-after-supreme-court-setback-this-is-over-and-above-our-normal-tariffs-101771613520151.html - Provided specific details on the announcement under Section 122, the description of the tariff as "over and above," and Trump's critical remarks about the court and praise for dissenting justices.
Financial Post: https://financialpost.com/news/economy/trump-unveils-10-global-tariff-many-nations-face-higher-rate - Detailed the global scope of the tariffs and provided examples of specific rates for different countries, as well as market reactions.
USA Today: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/02/20/supreme-court-trump-tariffs-ruling/87778248007/ - Covered Trump's strong reaction to the Supreme Court ruling and mentioned the stock market's positive reaction to the ruling itself, contrasting with the impact of Trump's new announcement.