US Supreme Court ruling on tariffs creates uncertainty for UK businesses importing steel

The US Supreme Court has limited the President's power to impose tariffs using the IEEPA, but other tariffs on steel and aluminium remain. This creates confusion for UK businesses.
By Newsroom | Trade, International Relations |

Key Ruling on Tariffs Creates Questions for Businesses

The recent decision by the US Supreme Court regarding tariffs has created a situation of uncertainty for businesses. While the ruling offers clarity on the President's executive power to impose certain duties, it leaves many questions unanswered for companies. The British government is reportedly working with the United States to understand the full impact of this judgment, particularly concerning ongoing trade issues like those affecting steel and aluminium.

Background of the Tariff Dispute

The US Supreme Court's ruling specifically addressed tariffs implemented by the President under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. These particular tariffs were part of a broader strategy aimed at revitalizing American manufacturing by imposing duties on foreign imports. The judgment found that the President's actions in this instance exceeded his executive authority.

However, the ruling is not a complete end to the tariff strategy. Other US tariffs, notably those on steel and aluminium, were enacted under different legislation, such as section 232 investigations. The President retains other avenues to maintain existing tariffs or introduce new ones, meaning the overall trade landscape remains complex.

Read More: Trump Announces 10% Global Tariff After Supreme Court Ruling in February 2026

Impact on British Businesses

The British Chambers of Commerce has highlighted that the Supreme Court's decision, while clarifying aspects of executive power, does not fully resolve the murky waters for businesses.

  • The ruling pertains to tariffs imposed under the IEEPA.

  • These include some tariffs introduced as part of the President's "Liberation Day" initiative.

  • Different laws were used for other tariffs, such as those on steel and aluminium.

  • The President has other methods available to continue his tariff policies.

This ambiguity means that businesses, particularly those involved in international trade with the US, need to closely monitor future developments and government actions.

International Reactions and Next Steps

The implications of the ruling extend beyond US domestic policy, affecting international trade partners. The UK is actively engaged in discussions with the US to analyze the judgment's consequences.

  • The UK government is reportedly collaborating with the US to assess the impact.

  • Discussions are focused on issues like steel and aluminium tariffs.

  • The aim is to reduce the scope of potential future duties and provide more certainty.

The President's upcoming State of the Union address may offer further insights into his administration's strategy and potential policy adjustments in light of the Supreme Court's decision.

Read More: Fox News Coverage on Iran: Did it Push Trump Towards War or Peace?

Expert Insights on the Ruling's Reach

Experts have indicated that the President has alternative routes to continue his tariff strategy despite the Supreme Court's ruling on specific actions.

"Trump had other tariff routes to continue his strategy – and not just the section 232 investigations that have seen targeted tariffs imposed on sectors such as steel."

This suggests that while a particular mechanism for imposing tariffs has been invalidated, the underlying intent to use tariffs as a trade policy tool remains a significant factor. The focus on section 232 investigations as a separate legal basis for tariffs underscores the differentiated approach being taken.

Conclusion: Navigating Trade Uncertainty

The US Supreme Court's ruling on tariffs has provided a degree of legal clarity regarding the President's use of the IEEPA but has simultaneously deepened the uncertainty for businesses. The UK government's engagement with the US reflects the critical need for a stable and predictable international trade environment. The existence of alternative legal frameworks for tariffs, such as those concerning steel and aluminium, means that the broader tariff landscape remains dynamic. Businesses will need to remain vigilant as further policy adjustments and international discussions unfold.

Read More: India US interim trade deal to start in April with lower tariffs

Sources:

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What did the US Supreme Court rule about tariffs?
The US Supreme Court ruled that the President used too much power when imposing some tariffs under a law called the IEEPA. This means those specific tariffs are now questioned.
Q: How does this ruling affect UK businesses, especially those importing steel?
The ruling creates uncertainty for UK businesses. While some tariffs are affected, others, like those on steel and aluminium, were put in place using different laws and may still be active, making trade rules unclear.
Q: What is the UK government doing about this ruling?
The UK government is talking with the US to understand exactly how this court decision will impact trade. They want to make trade more predictable for businesses.
Q: Are all US tariffs now stopped because of this ruling?
No, not all tariffs are stopped. The ruling was about tariffs made using the IEEPA. Tariffs on goods like steel and aluminium, which were made using different laws like section 232, can still be in place.
Q: What happens next for trade between the UK and the US?
Businesses need to watch closely for any new decisions or changes from the US government. The UK government is working to get more clarity to help businesses plan their trade activities.