Quantum Scientists Sign Manifesto Against Military Use of Physics Research

Over 100 quantum scientists signed a manifesto opposing military use of their research, a growing concern as defense budgets rise.

A collective of quantum researchers has launched a formal protest against the growing role of the military in their field. The group, known as Quantum Scientists for Disarmament, warns that the transition of quantum physics from a basic science to a tool for warfare creates ethical risks for researchers. This movement centers on a "Quantum Manifesto" that asks scientists to stop working on projects meant for war, surveillance, or population control. As major world powers increase spending on quantum technology for defense, these researchers claim the independence of science is at risk.

The Shift from Lab to Battlefield

The movement began during a physics workshop held in Benasque, Spain, between June and July 2025. Following these discussions, the group published a manifesto to address what they call the "militarization" of quantum research.

"We are a group of quantum scientists who oppose the ongoing militarization of our societies and the use of quantum research for military purposes." — Quantum Manifesto

  • January 13, 2026: The International Peace Bureau (IPB) published the manifesto’s goals.

  • January 2026: The Chief of Defence Staff in India released the "Military Quantum Mission Policy Framework" to integrate these tools into the armed forces.

  • February 3, 2026: Formal calls for signatures were sent to the broader physics community.

The core issue is a shift in funding: as government defense budgets for quantum tech grow, scientists find it harder to get money for purely civilian or peaceful research.

Read More: Natural Selection Works From Molecules Up To Ecosystems, Scientists Find

Technical Applications and Funding Sources

The manifesto lists specific technologies that were once purely academic but are now being adapted for combat and surveillance. The table below shows the dual nature of these tools.

In manifesto, scientists oppose ‘militarisation’ of quantum research - 1
TechnologyCivilian UsePotential Military Use
Quantum SensorsMedical imaging, mineral discoveryDetecting drones and hidden submarines
Quantum CryptographySecure banking and privacySecret military communications
Quantum ClocksScientific synchronizationNavigation and positioning without GPS
Quantum RadarWeather monitoringSatellite and stealth aircraft surveillance

Research indicates that the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in the United States has funded quantum science for many years. Similarly, the European Commission has labeled quantum sensors as a way to improve the performance of military operations.

The Objectives of the Movement

The manifesto outlines four primary goals for the scientific community:

  1. Public Rejection: Signatories publicly state they will not use their research for military ends.

  2. Ethical Debate: The group wants to force a discussion about the ethics of military-funded research, which they believe is long overdue.

  3. Network Building: They are creating a space for researchers to work together on "demilitarized" science.

  4. Collective Action: Encouraging scientists to refuse military money as a group rather than as individuals.

The manifesto also allows for anonymous signatures. This suggests that some researchers may fear that speaking out could result in a loss of funding or damage to their professional careers.

The Funding Trap

A major point of tension is the structure of modern research grants. Evidence shows that public funding is increasingly tied to "dual-use" projects. These are projects that have both a civilian and a military application.

Read More: Y Combinator Program Changes Affect Founder Experience and Global Reach

In manifesto, scientists oppose ‘militarisation’ of quantum research - 2
  • Dependency: Scientists note that as public research relies more on military budgets, the goals of the research change.

  • Service vs. Inquiry: Documentation suggests that when the military pays for science, the research becomes a "service" to the state rather than a search for basic knowledge.

  • Institutional Pressure: Without new ways to fund science, researchers find it difficult to maintain their independence.

"Funding structures shape not only what research is possible but what research becomes imaginable." — Quantum Formalism Analysis

Expert Perspective on Scientific Sovereignty

Experts in science policy suggest that the manifesto highlights a "modern scientist’s dilemma." On one side, the military provides the large-scale funding needed for complex quantum experiments. On the other side, this funding often comes with strings attached, such as secrecy or specific goals that may not benefit the public.

Does the current funding model allow a scientist to truly choose a peaceful path? If the majority of available money for high-level physics comes from defense agencies, a refusal to participate might end a researcher's ability to work. The manifesto argues that this is not just a personal choice but a structural problem that needs a collective solution.

Conclusion

The publication of the Quantum Manifesto marks a formal divide within the physics community. The investigators find that:

  • Military integration is active: Countries like India and the US, as well as the EU, have clear policies to use quantum tech for defense.

  • Funding is the main lever: The researchers' primary concern is not just the weapons themselves, but how military money changes what scientists study.

  • The movement is growing: By providing a platform for both public and anonymous signatures, the group is attempting to build a global network.

The next steps for this movement involve seeing if university departments will adopt these "civilian-only" rules and if governments will provide alternative funding that does not require military applications.

Read More: Routine Blood Tests May Show Cancer Risk 3 Years Early

Primary Sources

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Why did quantum scientists sign a manifesto against military use of their research?
A group called Quantum Scientists for Disarmament signed a manifesto to protest the increasing use of quantum physics for military purposes. They worry this will harm the independence and ethical direction of scientific research.
Q: What is the Quantum Manifesto asking scientists to do?
The Quantum Manifesto asks scientists to stop working on projects that are for war, spying, or controlling people. It also calls for a public rejection of military research and more discussion about the ethics of such funding.
Q: How does military funding affect quantum research?
Military funding is a major concern because it is growing faster than funding for peaceful research. This makes it harder for scientists to get money for civilian projects and can change the goals of their work from basic discovery to military service.
Q: What specific quantum technologies are being used for military purposes?
Technologies like quantum sensors for detecting drones, quantum cryptography for secure military communication, quantum clocks for navigation, and quantum radar for surveillance are being adapted for military use.
Q: What are the main goals of the Quantum Scientists for Disarmament movement?
The movement aims for scientists to publicly refuse military research, start ethical debates, build a network for peaceful science, and encourage collective action against military funding.
Q: What happens next for the quantum scientists' movement?
The next steps involve seeing if universities will support rules for civilian-only research and if governments will offer alternative funding sources that are not tied to military applications.