The Karnataka High Court has halted a criminal investigation into a software professional, ruling that the legal apparatus cannot be used as a tool for "personal vendetta" when adult romances fail. Justice M Nagaprasanna quashed proceedings under BNS Section 69, stating that consensual intimacy does not retroactively morph into a crime simply because a relationship dissolves or families object to a wedding.
The ruling clarifies that a "false promise" of marriage is only a crime if the intent to deceive existed at the very first touch. If the split comes from a change of heart, emotional friction, or parents saying no, the law has no business in the wreckage.
THE ANATOMY OF THE DISPUTE
| Element | Reality Found by Court |
|---|---|
| Duration | Two years of "shared domesticity" and cohabitation in Ireland. |
| Initial Status | Complainant was married with a five-year-old child when the bond began. |
| The Trigger | Complaint filed in August 2024 after the man’s family refused the union. |
| Current State | Evidence suggests the complainant has already moved to a new relationship. |
DISSECTING THE "DECEIT"
The court found the woman's narrative lacked any sign of coercion or initial trickery. Instead, the record showed two adults living together by choice.
Read More: Supreme Court Reviews Rap Lyrics Used in Texas Death Sentence Case
A promise is only a 'ruse' if it was a deceitful stratagem never meant to be kept.
Disappointment is not the same as deception.
The state's criminal justice system is an instrument of power, not a weapon for private grudges.
"If every broken relationship were to be clothed in the garb of criminality, the courts would transform into forums of personal vendetta, rather than forums of justice." — Justice M Nagaprasanna.
BEYOND BENGALURU: THE WIDER FRACTURE
This skepticism toward "clothed criminality" is echoing in other high benches. The Orissa High Court recently scrubbed a rape case, noting that the law shouldn't assume a woman only consents to sex as a "silent pledge" to a future contract.
The court labeled this assumption a vestige of patriarchal thought.
There is an urgent pressure to untie sex from marriage in the eyes of the law.
In separate instances, the Supreme Court has warned against the "growing misuse" of Section 498A (dowry laws) and cheating clauses to settle scores.
BACKGROUND: THE LEGAL THRESHOLD
For years, Indian courts have struggled with the "promise to marry" loophole used to file rape or fraud charges. Recent judgments suggest a tightening of what counts as "consent."
August 2023: Complainant obtained her divorce.
August 2024: Both parties returned to India; the criminal complaint was triggered.
Precedent: The Supreme Court has repeatedly signaled that the fabric of society is damaged when civil disputes are dressed in the rough clothes of criminal FIRs to force a settlement or seek revenge.