Former Special Counsel Jack Smith recently detailed his justifications for prosecuting Donald Trump, asserting that his team had amassed “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” regarding schemes to overturn the 2020 election and the willful retention of classified documents. In a closed-door deposition before the House Judiciary Committee on December 17, 2025, Smith pushed back against persistent accusations of political motivation leveled by Trump and his allies.
Smith explicitly stated that the decisions to pursue charges against Trump were based solely on the actions of the former president. “The basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions,” he told lawmakers. He also defended his pursuit of gag orders against Trump, explaining they were necessary to prevent statements that could influence ongoing cases and endanger individuals, including FBI agents.
The transcript and video of Smith’s deposition were released by the House Judiciary Committee on December 31, 2025. During the interview, Smith denied ever speaking with Joe Biden about the investigations or receiving instructions from Trump. He indicated that Trump associates, including Rudy Giuliani and Boris Epshteyn, had been interviewed by his team. Smith also testified that his team had evidence suggesting Trump directed alleged co-conspirators to contact senators regarding the election certification.
Read More: Comey charged for Instagram post; DOJ to review threats case by case
Background and Context
Smith’s appearance before the committee, necessitated by a subpoena after he declined a public hearing, aimed to address claims that his probes were politically motivated. Smith maintained that he would have pursued similar charges against any political figure, Republican or Democrat, had the evidence warranted it. He noted that his investigations, initiated in 2022, examined Trump's efforts to challenge the 2020 election results and the handling of classified materials at Mar-a-Lago.
The former special counsel acknowledged the risks associated with investigating a former president, noting Trump's public denunciations. Smith also suggested he would have pursued charges against Barack Obama under similar evidentiary circumstances. The cases brought by Smith were ultimately dropped after Trump's election last year, citing Justice Department legal opinions against indicting a sitting president. Smith's testimony comes after months of efforts by Trump appointees within the Justice Department and Republican lawmakers to discredit his investigations and support Trump's assertions of a weaponized legal system.
Read More: Judge Cites Justice Lawyer for Not Being Honest with Court
