Former Attorney General Pam Bondi will not appear for a scheduled deposition next week before a House committee investigating the government's handling of Jeffrey Epstein investigations. The Justice Department has informed the House Oversight Committee that the subpoena, issued when Bondi held her official title, is no longer applicable now that she has been removed from her post.

The department's position, communicated in a letter, asserts that the subpoena was specifically directed at Bondi "as Attorney General" and sought information in her "official capacity." With her departure from that role, the DOJ argues, the subpoena "no longer obligates" her to testify on April 14.

Lawmakers Divided on Next Steps
Some members of the House Oversight Committee, including Robert Garcia, a leading Democrat on the panel, insist Bondi must still appear. Garcia has indicated he will push to enforce the subpoena and has raised the prospect of contempt of Congress charges if she fails to do so. Garcia stressed that "survivors deserve justice."
Read More: Australia PM Albanese in Singapore to Secure Fuel Amid Rising Prices

Conversely, House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, who reportedly did not vote for the initial subpoena, stated he plans to discuss next steps with Republican members. The committee, however, has signaled its intent to continue pursuing Bondi's testimony as its investigation extends into the summer.

Background to the Standoff
Bondi's deposition was to address the Justice Department's handling of its investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and the department's review and release of related files. Bondi was removed as attorney general by President Donald Trump, with her deputy, Todd Blanche, now serving in an acting capacity.
Initially, Bondi had stated she would remain for a month to assist with the transition. However, the Justice Department's stance now suggests that Bondi's official duties related to the subpoena have concluded with her departure from office. This situation has drawn criticism from some, including Epstein survivors, who urge continued efforts to secure Bondi's testimony. The controversy is further complicated by a bipartisan vote to subpoena Bondi, reflecting shared concerns over her past handling of Epstein-related documents.
Read More: Trump's 2019 'I-Word' Threat: How Supreme Court Plans Affected Impeachment