High Court settles Countess Spencer privacy case

The High Court has settled a privacy dispute involving Countess Karen Spencer and Cat Jarman. The case, concerning the sharing of private medical information, has been resolved in court today.

The legal wrangling between Countess Karen Spencer and Cat Jarman, the partner of her estranged husband Earl Spencer, has reached a settlement, with the terms being read out in open court on Thursday. Lawyers for Ms Jarman stated that Countess Spencer agreed to settle the claim in August last year.

Partner of Earl Spencer settles High Court claim against his ex-wife - 1

The settlement was reached without any admission of liability or wrongdoing from Countess Spencer. The precise terms of the agreement were not disclosed during the hearing. Ms Jarman, an archaeologist who co-hosts a podcast with Earl Spencer, had accused Countess Spencer of disclosing her private medical information. Specifically, Ms Jarman alleged that her diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) was revealed to Earl Spencer and others without her consent.

Partner of Earl Spencer settles High Court claim against his ex-wife - 2

"Your medical information is your own, and people are not allowed to speculate on that or share it," Ms Jarman commented to the Press Association following the hearing. She added, "I’m delighted to be able to move on with my life now." Her solicitor, Dina Shiloh, had previously informed the court that her client had only shared her diagnosis with a "very small and trusted circle of people." Ms Jarman had brought the proceedings "in order to vindicate her right to medical privacy and to secure recognition of the wrong she considers has been done to her."

Read More: Turkey bans social media for under-15s from April 23, 2026

Partner of Earl Spencer settles High Court claim against his ex-wife - 3

Earl Spencer's Involvement

Notably, it has been confirmed that Earl Spencer will be required to indemnify Countess Spencer for costs associated with accepting the settlement offer. This means he will bear a significant portion, if not all, of the financial outlay related to resolving the dispute. Countess Spencer herself did not appear at the hearing, nor was she represented.

Background to the Dispute

The legal battle originated from Ms Jarman's claim that her privacy was "seriously violated" when her medical data was shared without permission. She alleged that Countess Spencer disclosed her MS diagnosis to Earl Spencer and other individuals. Countess Spencer, in her defence documents, had previously asserted that any disclosures were "entirely justified and legitimate" in response to how she felt she had been treated.

The public nature of the legal action brought details of the breakdown of the Spencers’ 13-year marriage into the open. Earl Spencer publicly announced his separation from Countess Spencer in the summer of 2025, describing the situation as "immensely sad." Rumours of Earl Spencer's relationship with Professor Jarman had begun to circulate around the same period. The potential cost of the protracted legal dispute was estimated to be upwards of £2 million.

Read More: UK Borrowing Drops, But Iran Conflict May Raise Costs

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What privacy dispute was settled in the High Court today?
The High Court settled a privacy dispute between Countess Karen Spencer and Cat Jarman. Ms Jarman claimed her private medical information, specifically her multiple sclerosis diagnosis, was shared without her consent by Countess Spencer.
Q: Who is paying the costs for the Countess Spencer privacy case settlement?
Earl Spencer will be required to indemnify Countess Spencer for the costs associated with the settlement. This means he will pay a significant portion, or all, of the financial costs of resolving the dispute.
Q: What did Cat Jarman say after the privacy case settlement?
Cat Jarman stated she was delighted to move on with her life and that medical information is private and should not be shared. She brought the case to protect her right to medical privacy and recognise the wrong done to her.
Q: Was there any admission of wrongdoing in the Countess Spencer privacy case?
No, the settlement was reached without any admission of liability or wrongdoing from Countess Spencer. The exact terms of the agreement were not revealed in court.
Q: What was the background to the privacy dispute between Countess Spencer and Cat Jarman?
The dispute began when Ms Jarman alleged her privacy was seriously violated by the sharing of her MS diagnosis. Countess Spencer's defence stated any disclosures were justified in response to how she felt treated.