A federal judge has dismissed Laura Loomer's defamation lawsuit against HBO and comedian Bill Maher, ruling that Maher's on-air remark alluding to a relationship between Loomer and Donald Trump did not constitute defamation. The judge found that Loomer failed to demonstrate the core elements required for such a claim, including falsity, actual malice, and demonstrable harm.
The court granted summary judgment to Maher and HBO, effectively ending Loomer's case before it could proceed to trial. This decision hinges on Loomer's inability to prove that Maher knowingly made a false statement or that his comments caused her any measurable damage to her reputation or finances.
The lawsuit, filed in 2024, stemmed from a 2023 "Real Time with Bill Maher" segment where Maher quipped about Loomer's closeness to Trump, suggesting a possible "arranged relationship" or alluding to her potentially being "in an affair" with the former president. Loomer alleged this statement was a false accusation of adultery, damaging her credibility and costing her a White House job opportunity.
Read More: Nintendo faces lawsuit over tariff refunds from US gamers
However, the judge's order detailed several failures in Loomer's argument. She did not present evidence of anyone who believed Maher's insinuation as a factual statement. Furthermore, Loomer’s own testimony indicated her income had increased in 2024 compared to previous years, and she continued to have contact with President Trump, receiving his opinions and invitations to the White House. The alleged damages associated with lost job opportunities were deemed entirely speculative. The judge noted that given the public speculation surrounding Loomer's proximity to Trump at the time, there was no evidence Maher acted with knowing falsehood.
Loomer, a prominent right-wing activist and self-described "Trump loyalist," has a history of controversial statements, including espousing anti-Muslim views, which led to her ban from Twitter for violating rules against hateful behavior. Her lawsuit, seeking $150 million plus punitive damages, was seen by her legal team as an attempt to attack Trump and harm Loomer's credibility. The legal proceedings also involved contentious deposition phases, with Loomer's lawyer accused of unprofessional conduct.
Read More: Warsh Fed Nominee Faces Questions on Independence