The Winter Olympics curling competition has become embroiled in a widening scandal, with accusations of "double-touching" – a rule violation where a player touches a stone after releasing it – now extending to Team GB. This controversy, initially focused on Canadian teams, has seen Great Britain's men's team accused of the same infraction, leading to increased scrutiny and debate within the sport. The stakes are high as these allegations cast a shadow over the integrity of the competition.
Escalation of Rule Violations in Olympic Curling
The "double-touching" controversy, a rule violation in curling, has seen a notable escalation during the Winter Olympics. The infraction occurs when a player's hand touches a delivered curling stone after it has been released. Initially, the focus was on Canadian teams. Sweden had formally accused Canada's men's team of this violation, prompting officials to monitor play more closely.
Read More: Curling Rule Break: Team GB and Canada Penalized
Friday: The controversy began with accusations against Canadian male curlers, with video evidence circulating on social media.
Saturday: The issue resurfaced during a women's group game involving Canada and Switzerland. Rachel Homan, the Canadian skip, had a stone removed from play after an official determined she had committed a double-touch.
Following Incidents: Following these events, World Curling directed umpires to be positioned between matches to observe deliveries more diligently.
Team GB's Involvement: Subsequently, Team GB's men's team was also accused of the same infraction. Reports suggest that Great Britain was "dinged" for a similar violation.
Official Response: World Curling issued updated guidance regarding the monitoring of deliveries after the initial controversies.
Nature of the "Double-Touching" Infraction
The rules governing stone delivery in curling are precise, with specific regulations concerning contact with the stone after its release.
Read More: Curling Game Rule Questioned at Winter Olympics
The Hog Line: A key element is the "hog line," a line across the ice.
Release Point: Players are permitted to retouch the handle of the stone multiple times before it crosses the hog line during delivery.
Violation: However, any touch of the stone after the handle has been released is considered a violation.
Consequence: The penalty for such a violation is the removal of the stone from play.
Detection: Stones are equipped with sensors designed to indicate if the grip has been released before the hog line. Despite these sensors, visual observations, often aided by video, have become central to the current disputes.
| Aspect | Rule | Violation Occurs When | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stone Release | Player can retouch handle multiple times before the hog line. | Player touches the stone after releasing the handle. | Stone is removed. |
| Sensors | Stones have sensors to confirm grip release before the hog line. | Implied - if sensor fails or visual observation differs. | Unspecified |
Differing Perspectives on Video Evidence and Adjudication
The "double-touching" allegations have exposed a divide among curlers regarding the use of technology and officiating in the sport.
Read More: Nations Compete for Medals at 2026 Winter Olympics
Video Evidence: Social media footage has played a significant role in surfacing and substantiating these claims. The visual nature of the alleged infractions has made them particularly contentious.
Use of Replays: There is a division of opinion on whether video replays, similar to those used in other sports, should be formally adopted by World Curling to adjudicate disputes.
Current Policy: World Curling currently does not employ video replays for reviewing gameplay during matches.
Player Reactions: Some players have expressed a willingness to review video evidence, with one instance mentioned where a player offered to show an opponent footage of an alleged double-touch. Conversely, the reliance on visual evidence has led to debates about its certainty and fairness.
Team GB's Entanglement in the Controversy
Team GB has been drawn into the unfolding curling scandal, facing accusations similar to those leveled against Canadian teams.
Read More: Canada Says Sweden Filmed Them Wrongly in Curling Fight
Direct Accusation: Great Britain has been accused of the same "double-touching" violation that has preoccupied the Canadian contingent.
Game Outcome: In one instance involving Team GB, despite a stone being removed due to a perceived infraction, the team still managed to score points in that end and ultimately secured a win against their opponents.
Official Observation: Following the initial controversy involving Canada, World Curling increased its efforts to monitor deliveries, leading to closer examination of all participating teams, including Team GB.
Co-commentator Reaction: A former GB Olympic curler, Jackie Lockhart, was heard reacting with dismay ("Not again") when a similar incident occurred involving Canada's Rachel Homan, highlighting the pervasive nature of the issue within the curling community.
Expert Analysis and Broader Implications
The ongoing controversy raises significant questions about fairness, officiating, and the evolving nature of sportsmanship in high-stakes competitions.
Read More: Winter Olympics Day 10: Many Medal Events Today
"The integrity of the game hinges on clear rules and consistent application. When visual evidence, however compelling on its own, leads to dispute and widespread accusations, it suggests a need for clearer protocols or even updated officiating methods." - An unnamed curling analyst cited in published reports.
Scrutiny on Officials: The situation has placed increased pressure on game umpires to be vigilant and accurate in their observations.
Impact on Athletes: Accusations of cheating, even if contested, can affect player morale and the public perception of the sport.
Future of Officiating: The debate over video replays indicates a potential inflection point for how officiating is conducted in curling at the elite level. The desire for irrefutable evidence in the face of close calls is palpable.
Conclusion: A Sport Under a Microscope
The "double-touching" scandal has cast a significant pall over the Winter Olympics curling competition. What began as specific accusations against Canadian teams has broadened, directly implicating Team GB and drawing other nations into the discussion. The reliance on visual interpretation, amplified by social media, has created a volatile environment where rules are being rigorously questioned and debated.
Read More: Canada Curlers Say Sweden Filmed Them Wrongly
Key Findings:
Team GB has been accused of the same "double-touching" rule violation previously leveled against Canadian curlers.
The infraction involves touching a curling stone after its release, leading to its removal from play.
Video evidence has been central to the accusations, though its formal use in officiating is contested.
World Curling has increased umpire oversight in response to the incidents.
Implications: The controversy has initiated a broader conversation about the necessity of video replay technology in curling and the potential impact on the sport's traditional methods of adjudication. The sport faces a critical juncture in maintaining fairness and public trust.
Next Steps: Further clarification from World Curling regarding officiating protocols and potential technological integration may be anticipated. The outcomes of these investigations and discussions will likely shape future competitions.
Sources Used:
Read More: Winter Olympics 2026: What to Watch on Tuesday, February 15th
Daily Mail: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/winterolympics/article-15563675/Team-GB-dragged-Winter-Olympics-curling-cheating-scandal-caught-TV-Canada-double-touching-drama.html (Published: 34 minutes ago) - Provided details on Team GB's involvement and initial incident with Rachel Homan.
ABC News: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026/02/16/winter-olympics-curling-cheating-allegations-explained/106349394 (Published: 10 hours ago) - Offered context on the widening controversy and accusations against multiple teams.
New York Post: https://nypost.com/2026/02/15/sports/olympic-curling-scandal-grows-as-great-britain-dinged-for-same-violation-as-canada/ (Published: 15 hours ago) - Confirmed Team GB's involvement and discussed differing opinions on video replays.
SportBible: https://www.sportbible.com/other/winter-olympics-cheating-team-gb-068645-20260216 (Published: 1 hour ago) - Explained the rules of double-touching and detailed the sequence of events involving Canada and Team GB.
BBC Sport: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/articles/cjen94eg9nko (Published: 2 days ago) - Provided an in-depth explanation of the double-touching infraction, including the role of sensors and initial accusations against Canada's Marc Kennedy.
