Exiled Iranian Kurdish groups operating from northern Iraq are indicating a readiness to engage in cross-border operations against the Iranian regime, spurred by ongoing aerial assaults on Iran and what they perceive as internal weakening. These factions, some designated as terrorist organizations by Iran, have long maintained a presence along the Iran-Iraq border, frequently clashing with Iranian security forces in Kurdish-majority regions. Their stated goal centers on achieving self-determination for Kurds, with some envisioning an independent Kurdistan.
US officials have reportedly urged Iraqi Kurdish leaders to provide military backing to these Iranian Kurdish groups, and discussions about potential US support, including arms and a green light for cross-border movement, have surfaced. The CIA, according to sources, has been engaged in arming these Kurdish forces for months prior to the current escalation. These groups possess battle-hardened experience, notably from their involvement in campaigns against the Islamic State group.
Read More: Britain's New Stance on Iran War: Why UK May Not Join Full US Attacks
Operational Posturing
Kurdish commanders in Iraq assert their long-held plans to cross the border into Iran, though they deny current incursions. Their leaders are calling for international endorsement of any such moves, particularly in support of figures like Trump, who has seemingly explored military intervention. The notion of Kurdish fighters forming the "boots on the ground" in Iran is a recurring theme, with preparations cited as having been underway for decades.
A Delicate Balance
The presence of armed Iranian Kurdish factions within Iraq's autonomous Kurdistan region has been a persistent point of contention between Baghdad and Tehran. Iran has historically conducted cross-border strikes against these groups, and some commanders anticipate Iran may retaliate by targeting their positions in northern Iraq should broader conflict erupt.
Strategic Hesitation Amidst Shifting Tides
Despite the expressed readiness, some Kurdish leadership, like that of the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan (PDKI), express caution. They indicate that the timing for direct military action is not yet opportune, particularly as Trump appears to be stepping back from overt threats of US military intervention. A premature move, without external backing, could lead to significant negative consequences. Reports suggest Iranian authorities' crackdown on dissent has resulted in a substantial number of casualties.
Read More: Iran conflict spreads in Middle East, causing global worry