A federal judge has tossed out a defamation lawsuit brought by prominent Trump ally Laura Loomer against comedian Bill Maher and HBO. The suit, which centered on a joke Maher made on his show "Real Time with Bill Maher" in September 2024 insinuating an affair between Loomer and President Donald Trump, was dismissed on grounds that it constituted protected speech and did not meet the threshold for defamation.
U.S. District Judge James Moody ruled that Maher’s comment was clearly intended as a joke, not a statement of fact, given the public discourse and speculation surrounding Loomer's proximity to Trump at the time. The judge emphasized that a reasonable viewer would have understood the remark within the context of comedy and the prevailing media environment, which was reportedly filled with jokes about Trump's relationships.
Read More: High Court settles Countess Spencer privacy case
The ruling, detailed in an 18-page decision, found that Loomer failed to demonstrate several key elements required for a defamation case. Specifically, she did not prove that Maher knowingly made a false statement, nor did she identify any specific individuals who believed the insinuation due to Maher’s comment. Furthermore, the judge stated that Loomer did not establish any quantifiable harm or damage to her reputation or finances stemming from the remark.
In fact, the judge noted that Loomer’s own testimony indicated her income had increased in 2024 compared to previous years. She also stated she continues to meet with and receive solicited opinions from President Trump, and still receives invitations to the White House. Any alleged damages related to lost job opportunities were deemed entirely speculative by the court.
Read More: ActBlue CEO faces contempt for withholding donation probe data
Loomer, who has described herself as an independent investigative journalist, had argued that Maher's comment lowered her standing within Trump's circle and cost her a job opportunity. She criticized the ruling as "totally dishonest and misogynistic" and an "attack on women and the truth." Loomer has vowed to appeal the decision, expressing determination to seek justice.
Background to the Dispute
The lawsuit arose from an episode of "Real Time with Bill Maher" that aired shortly after Loomer had attended a presidential debate and a 9/11 memorial event with President Trump. During the segment, Maher, known for his political commentary and humor, pondered "who’s Trump f———?" and then mused, "I think it might be Laura Loomer." This remark occurred amid a flurry of media attention and online speculation regarding Loomer's relationship with Trump.
Loomer, a polarizing figure in right-wing circles, has a well-documented history as a controversial activist. Her prominence grew during Trump's first administration, and she has faced bans from various online platforms and services due to her anti-Muslim posts. The judge's decision referenced Loomer's own admissions about her "close relationship" with Trump, including visits to his properties and travel with him.
Read More: Turkey bans social media for under-15s from April 23, 2026
Maher and HBO, represented as co-defendants, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The judge’s decision highlighted the distinction between satirical commentary and factual assertion, particularly in the charged atmosphere of political discourse. Loomer’s legal team has indicated plans for appeals, potentially extending the case to higher courts.
