Federal Judge Ends Blake Lively's Sexual Harassment Claims Against Justin Baldoni in New Jersey

A federal judge has thrown out 10 of Blake Lively's 13 claims against director Justin Baldoni, leaving only 3 to go to trial. This is a major shift in the legal battle.

A federal judge has dismissed 10 of Blake Lively’s 13 legal claims against director Justin Baldoni. Judge Lewis Liman determined that the actor’s sexual harassment allegations failed to meet necessary legal thresholds, specifically citing her status as an independent contractor under federal law and the location of filming in New Jersey as bars to her initial filings.

Donald Trump slaps 100 per cent tariff on major Aussie export - 1

The court has winnowed the dispute to three surviving counts: breach of contract, retaliation, and aiding and abetting in retaliation. These claims are now scheduled to proceed to trial.

Donald Trump slaps 100 per cent tariff on major Aussie export - 2

Case Status Summary

Claim CategoryStatus
Sexual HarassmentDismissed
Defamation / ConspiracyDismissed
Breach of ContractActive
RetaliationActive
Aiding and AbettingActive

Legal representatives for Lively have framed the path forward as a pursuit of justice against "online retaliation" and a struggle to preserve the actor’s professional reputation. Conversely, Baldoni’s defense has maintained that the original allegations were instrumentalized as a tactic to seize creative control of the film project, It Ends With Us, and to cast him in a villainous light.

Read More: Judge Throws Out Most of Blake Lively's Lawsuit Against Justin Baldoni on April 2

The current ruling is the latest movement in a broader, oscillating cycle of litigation that began surrounding the 2024 romantic drama. Throughout 2025, the legal environment proved volatile for both parties:

  • Baldoni’s Counter-Action: In June 2025, Judge Liman dismissed a $400 million defamation suit filed by Baldoni against Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and the New York Times. The court ruled that allegations made within a lawsuit are legally privileged and protected from libel claims.

  • Procedural Allegations: During the discovery phase, Baldoni’s team attempted to subpoena communications involving third parties, including Taylor Swift, suggesting potential extortion—an assertion Lively’s team denied. Those subpoenas were later withdrawn.

  • The DARVO Framework: In a June 2025 filing, 14 advocacy organizations, including the National Network to End Domestic Violence, submitted an amicus brief supporting Lively, arguing that Baldoni utilized the DARVO (Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender) psychological tactic to suppress the initial harassment claims.

Despite mediation attempts in February, no settlement has been reached. The focus of the proceedings has shifted entirely from the broader initial allegations of misconduct toward the remaining narrow contractual and retaliatory grievances. Trial proceedings are expected to commence in March 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What happened to Blake Lively's legal claims against Justin Baldoni?
A federal judge dismissed 10 out of 13 claims, including sexual harassment allegations. Only three claims remain: breach of contract, retaliation, and aiding and abetting retaliation.
Q: Why were most of Blake Lively's claims dismissed?
The judge ruled that Lively's status as an independent contractor and the filming location in New Jersey did not meet legal requirements for those specific claims.
Q: What claims are still going to trial?
The case will now focus on breach of contract, retaliation, and aiding and abetting in retaliation.
Q: When will the trial for the remaining claims happen?
The trial for the three active claims is expected to start in March 2026.
Q: What was Justin Baldoni's defense against the claims?
Baldoni's team stated that Lively used the allegations as a way to gain control of the film 'It Ends With Us' and make him look bad.
Q: Has there been any other legal action between them?
Yes, Baldoni previously filed a $400 million defamation suit against Lively and others, which was also dismissed by the court.