Recent events in the Baltic Sea highlight growing concerns about European security and the potential need for greater regional self-reliance in defence. Incidents involving undersea infrastructure damage, with suspicions pointing towards Russian and Chinese vessels, have spurred Baltic nations to forge new alliances and cooperation methods. These efforts are seen by some as a model for how Europe might bolster its defence capabilities, independent of direct US leadership.
Tensions and Infrastructure Damage in the Baltic Sea
The Baltic Sea region has become a focal point for security discussions due to a series of incidents impacting vital undersea infrastructure.
Allegations of Sabotage: Authorities in Sweden, Finland, and Estonia have investigated damage to undersea cables and a gas pipeline occurring on the night of October 7th. Reports suggest a Chinese-owned ship with strong links to Russia, the Newnew Polar Bear, was present during these events.
Repeat Incidents: Another incident involved a Chinese merchant ship, Yi Peng 3, accused of damaging seabed infrastructure belonging to NATO nations. This ship reportedly stopped outside Danish territorial waters before continuing its journey, raising questions about adherence to international maritime law, specifically the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which prohibits deliberate harm to undersea infrastructure.
Finnish Preparedness: Finland experienced a significant disruption on Christmas Day last year when four undersea cables were damaged within hours in its waters. However, Finnish authorities were reportedly prepared for such events, having anticipated the possibility of such disruptions.
Baltic Nations Forge New Defence Cooperations
In response to these growing security challenges, Baltic Sea nations are actively pursuing cooperative defence initiatives, with some suggesting these smaller-scale alliances could inform NATO's future.
Regional Surveillance: Finland announced in January its intention to collaborate with other Baltic Sea countries to establish a maritime surveillance center. This initiative aims to enhance the monitoring of regional waters and undersea assets.
Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF): The United Kingdom-led Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) has a plan to monitor undersea installations in the Baltic Sea. This effort is viewed as a positive step in protecting critical infrastructure.
Localised Cooperation: The approach of teaming up in smaller, regional groups is seen as imperative, allowing NATO countries to manage their specific regional security needs without direct reliance on the broader NATO framework or the United States.
Elisabeth Braw's Perspective on European Defence
Elisabeth Braw, a recognized expert in European defence and security, has been a prominent voice in discussions about the continent's strategic future and its reliance on the US.
Read More: India and Israel Sign New Defence Deal Before PM Modi's Visit to Israel
Expertise: Braw holds significant positions, including Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Transatlantic Security Initiative and a columnist for publications like POLITICO Europe and Foreign Policy. She has also directed projects focusing on modern deterrence and societal resilience.
Focus on Resilience: Her work often emphasizes the blending of traditional deterrence with societal resilience to counter emerging forms of warfare. She has participated in conferences discussing how Europe can defend itself with potentially less American involvement.
Broader Security Concerns: Braw's analysis extends to the implications of great power competition for Europe and the need to enhance public awareness and community spirit regarding defence.
Assessing the Implications for NATO and US Reliance
The developments in the Baltic Sea raise pertinent questions about the future of European defence and its relationship with the United States.
US Role in European Defence: The Baltic nations, having joined NATO for protection against Russia, now find themselves considering regional cooperation that does not necessitate US leadership. This prompts reflection on the evolving role of the US as a security guarantor for Europe.
Future of NATO: The localized cooperation observed among Baltic Sea nations is suggested as a potential blueprint for NATO's future, indicating a possible shift towards more decentralized and region-specific security arrangements.
Economic and Societal Defence: Beyond military strategies, there is a recognized need for economic responses, such as reviving the European defence-industrial base, and societal responses, such as increasing resilience and public awareness, to effectively address contemporary security challenges.
Conclusion and Future Considerations
The Baltic Sea region is emerging as a critical testbed for new European defence strategies. The observed trend towards regional cooperation, spurred by infrastructure security concerns and a perceived need for greater self-reliance, suggests a potential evolution in how European nations approach their collective defence. While the precise attribution of the undersea infrastructure damage remains under investigation, the response from Baltic nations underscores a proactive stance in securing their immediate security environment.
The effectiveness of these localized alliances, their integration with broader NATO structures, and their capacity to adapt to evolving threats will be crucial in shaping Europe's future security landscape, particularly in the context of potential shifts in US security commitments. Further monitoring of cooperative defence initiatives in the region, alongside efforts to strengthen industrial and societal resilience, appears to be a prudent course of action.
Read More: European study shows homeless LGBTIQ+ youth lack safe support services
Sources:
The Guardian: Published approximately 48 minutes ago, this article discusses Europe's survival without US defence and highlights the Baltic Sea nations' proactive approach.
Politico: Published on November 15, 2023, this article delves into the Baltic Sea sabotage incidents and the challenges faced by regional defenders.
Link: https://www.politico.eu/article/baltic-sea-nato-sweden-sabotage-a-defenders-dilemma/
Politico: Published on January 23, 2025, this article offers creative solutions for protecting undersea cables from sabotage, mentioning Finnish preparedness and the JEF.
Link: https://www.politico.eu/article/undersea-cables-finland-eagle-s-tanker-jef-baltic-sea-eez-nato/
CEPA: Published on November 25, 2024, this article examines the rising stakes in the Baltic Sea sabotage standoff, referencing incidents involving Chinese merchant ships and seabed infrastructure damage.
Link: https://cepa.org/article/stakes-rise-in-baltic-sabotage-standoff/
Atlantic Council: This source provides background on Elisabeth Braw, detailing her role as a Senior Fellow with the Transatlantic Security Initiative.
Link: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/expert/elisabeth-braw/
NATO PA: This source identifies Elisabeth Braw's function as Director of Modern Deterrence at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) and notes her journalistic background.
Fondation d'Arenberg: This source lists Elisabeth Braw as an attendee and speaker at a conference on defending Europe, highlighting her expertise in societal resilience.
