Many individuals struggle to tell the difference between real human faces and those created by artificial intelligence (AI), a situation that has experts concerned about potential misuse. Studies indicate a widespread overconfidence in people's ability to detect these synthetic images.
The Growing Challenge of AI-Generated Faces
As AI technology advances, the ability to create realistic human faces has become increasingly sophisticated. This poses a challenge for ordinary individuals, as AI-generated faces are often indistinguishable from real ones.

AI tools are trained on vast datasets of real people's images.
This training allows AI to produce highly convincing synthetic faces.
The accuracy of AI-generated faces can lead to misidentification.
Performance in Identifying AI Faces
Research has explored people's accuracy in distinguishing between real and AI-generated faces. The results suggest that most individuals are not adept at this task.
Ordinary participants often correctly identify AI faces only about 31% to 51% of the time.
Even individuals with exceptional face recognition skills, known as "super-recognizers," face difficulties, correctly identifying AI faces only around 41% to 64% of the time without specific training.
"Up until now, people have been confident of their ability to spot a fake face," said co-author Dr. James Dunn. "With AI faces now almost impossible to distinguish from real ones, this misplaced confidence could make people more vulnerable to scammers and fraudsters, they warned."
Why Are AI Faces So Convincing?
AI systems, particularly those using generative adversarial networks (GANs), excel at creating hyper-realistic faces. This realism stems from their extensive training data.

AI tools learn from tens of thousands of real human images.
This process allows them to replicate complex facial features with remarkable fidelity.
It's likely that several different factors are working together to make AI-generated faces appear more realistic than real faces.
Bias in AI Face Generation
A notable observation in some studies is the potential for bias in AI-generated faces.
Read More: How accredited investors can buy Anduril stock before IPO
Training datasets often consist primarily of images of white individuals.
This can result in AI-generated white faces appearing more realistic than AI-generated faces of color, and even more realistic than actual white human faces.
"This means white AI-generated faces look more real than AI-generated faces of colour, as well as white human faces."
Factors Influencing Detection Accuracy
While general intelligence or prior AI experience do not reliably predict who can spot AI faces, certain abilities appear to play a role.

Object recognition ability, or the capacity to differentiate visually similar items, seems to be a significant factor.
Individuals who can distinguish visually similar objects tend to be better at spotting AI-generated faces.
The Impact of Training
Research indicates that even brief training can significantly improve people's ability to identify AI-generated faces.
A short training session, around five minutes, focusing on common AI rendering flaws (e.g., unusual hair patterns, incorrect tooth counts), has shown to boost detection accuracy.
This training benefits both ordinary individuals and super-recognizers.
The improvement suggests practical applications for tasks like social media moderation and identity verification.
"Just five minutes of training showing common AI rendering flaws—like oddly rendered hair or incorrect tooth counts—significantly improved detection accuracy for both super-recognizers and typical participants."
Implications and Concerns
The widespread inability to reliably distinguish between real and AI-generated faces raises significant concerns.

Scams and Fraud: Misplaced confidence in identifying fake faces could make individuals more susceptible to online scams and fraud.
Misinformation: Highly realistic AI-generated faces could be used to spread false or misleading messages online, impacting public discourse and trust.
Social Impact: The ubiquity of AI-generated images, including those used in advertising or media, means many individuals may be interacting with non-existent people online.
Researchers fear that digital fakes could help the spread of false and misleading messages online.
Areas Requiring Further Investigation
The accuracy of current AI detection methods and the potential for AI to simulate watermark removal in real videos are areas requiring ongoing attention, as suggested by projects like the one from Kellogg Northwestern.
The effectiveness of watermarking in AI-generated content needs continuous evaluation.
Methods to simulate watermark removal in real videos could complicate detection efforts.
Conclusion
The evidence strongly suggests that distinguishing AI-generated faces from real ones is a complex task that currently eludes the majority of people. Despite advancements in AI, the human capacity to detect these fakes remains limited, often influenced by factors like object recognition skills rather than general intelligence or specialized face recognition abilities. However, the prospect of improvement through brief, targeted training offers a potential avenue for enhancing detection capabilities. The implications of this technological gap are substantial, highlighting vulnerabilities to misinformation and fraud, and underscoring the need for greater public awareness and more robust detection strategies.
Read More: AI Chatbots Develop Own Communication Methods for Faster Work
Sources:
Article 1: Daily Mail. (57 minutes ago). Can you tell the difference between real and AI-generated people? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15573431/fake-faces-test-real-AI-generated-people.html
Article 2: The New York Times. (January 19, 2024). Test Yourself: Which Faces Were Made by A.I.? https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/01/19/technology/artificial-intelligence-image-generators-faces-quiz.html
Article 3: Metro. (November 17, 2025). Can you spot the real human faces? Test your eyes with our interactive quiz. https://www.metro.co.uk/2025/11/17/can-spot-real-human-faces-test-eyes-interactive-quiz-24699455/
Article 4: Kellogg, Northwestern University. (Date not specified, accessed via Bing). DeepFakes, Can You Spot Them? https://detectfakes.kellogg.northwestern.edu/
Article 5: Medical Xpress. (2 days ago). Can you spot an AI face? A new test shows why some people do better. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-02-ai-people.html
Article 6: The Times. (Date not specified, accessed via Bing). Are you for real? Here’s how to spot AI-generated faces. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/uk/science/article/how-to-spot-ai-generated-faces-quiz-j07lbmcmc?msockid=033a8cb2abf26a3a0d5f9bb7aa356b2e
Article 7: ScienceAlert. (January 9, 2026). AI Faces Fool Most of Us, But 5 Minutes of Training May Help You Spot Fakes. https://www.sciencealert.com/ai-faces-fool-most-of-us-but-5-minutes-of-training-may-help-you-spot-fakes
Article 8: Australian National University. (November 14, 2023). Can you spot the AI impostors? We found AI faces can look more real than actual humans. https://science.anu.edu.au/news-events/news/can-you-spot-ai-impostors-we-found-ai-faces-can-look-more-real-actual-humans
Article 9: Study Finds. (November 12, 2025). Can You Spot AI-Generated Fake Faces? 5 Minutes Of Training Can Do The Trick. https://studyfinds.org/spotting-ai-generated-fake-faces-5-minutes-of-training-helps/