Olympic Committee Stops Ukrainian Athlete from Wearing Helmet Honoring Fallen Athletes

The Olympic Committee has told Ukrainian skeleton racer Vladyslav Heraskevych he cannot wear a helmet showing pictures of Ukrainian athletes who died in the war. Ukraine says this is wrong, but the committee says it is against the rules.
By Newsroom | Olympics, Ukraine |

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has disallowed Ukrainian skeleton racer Vladyslav Heraskevych from wearing a helmet adorned with images of Ukrainian athletes killed in the ongoing conflict with Russia. This decision has ignited controversy, with Ukraine accusing the IOC of betrayal and the athlete vowing to wear the helmet regardless.

Banning Ukrainians for honouring war dead while letting Russian athletes compete - this shambolic decision shows the Olympic movement is going only one way, writes RIATH AL-SAMARRAI - 1

The core of the dispute lies in the IOC's interpretation of its Olympic Charter, specifically Article 50, which prohibits political statements during the Games. Heraskevych and the Ukrainian Olympic Committee argue that the helmet is a memorial, not a political statement, and does not breach the rules. The IOC, however, maintains it contravenes guidelines. While offered a black armband as a compromise, Heraskevych has rejected it, insisting on wearing his helmet during competition. This situation draws a sharp contrast with the IOC's stance on Russian athletes, some of whom are permitted to compete as neutrals despite Russia's role in the conflict.

Read More: American Skier Breezy Johnson Gets Engaged After Olympic Crash

Banning Ukrainians for honouring war dead while letting Russian athletes compete - this shambolic decision shows the Olympic movement is going only one way, writes RIATH AL-SAMARRAI - 2

Timeline of Events and Key Actors

  • Vladyslav Heraskevych: A Ukrainian skeleton racer competing in the Milan Cortina Games.

  • International Olympic Committee (IOC): The governing body responsible for the Olympic Games and their rules.

  • Ukrainian Olympic Committee: The national Olympic committee for Ukraine, which has supported Heraskevych's appeal.

  • Ongoing Russia-Ukraine War: The backdrop against which these events are unfolding, leading to the deaths of Ukrainian athletes.

Key Developments:

  • Heraskevych wore a helmet commemorating fallen Ukrainian athletes during training sessions.

  • The IOC officially banned the helmet, citing violations of the Olympic Charter's rules against political statements.

  • Heraskevych stated his intention to wear the helmet on race day, despite the ban.

  • The IOC offered Heraskevych the option to wear a black armband as a compromise, which he declined.

  • Ukraine's Prime Minister and President have reportedly expressed support for Heraskevych.

  • The IOC's decision is juxtaposed with its allowance of some Russian athletes to compete as neutral individuals.

Memorial Helmet Sparks IOC Scrutiny

Ukrainian skeleton racer Vladyslav Heraskevych aimed to compete wearing a helmet featuring images of Ukrainian athletes who have died since the start of the conflict with Russia. He utilized this helmet during training runs, intending to wear it during official competitions.

Read More: UK Gives Ukraine More Military Help

Banning Ukrainians for honouring war dead while letting Russian athletes compete - this shambolic decision shows the Olympic movement is going only one way, writes RIATH AL-SAMARRAI - 3

  • Heraskevych stated his resolve: "I used it yesterday [at training], I used it today [at training], I will use it tomorrow and I will use it on race day."

  • The IOC's decision to prohibit the helmet was based on its assessment that it violated the Olympic Charter's guidelines against political statements.

  • =An alternative was proposed: Heraskevych was permitted to wear a black armband as a gesture of remembrance.=

  • Heraskevych rejected the armband, finding it an insufficient substitute for his intended tribute.

Conflicting Interpretations of Olympic Charter

The crux of the disagreement centers on whether Heraskevych's helmet constitutes a prohibited political statement.

Banning Ukrainians for honouring war dead while letting Russian athletes compete - this shambolic decision shows the Olympic movement is going only one way, writes RIATH AL-SAMARRAI - 4

  • Heraskevych's Position: He views the helmet as a tribute to fallen athletes and not an expression of political ideology.

  • His appeal, supported by the Ukrainian Olympic Committee, argues that the helmet does not carry political slogans or express racial discrimination.

  • IOC's Position: The committee classified the helmet as a political statement, deeming it a breach of the Olympic Charter.

  • An IOC spokesman, Mark Adams, indicated a desire to address Heraskevych's wishes with "compassion and understanding" while upholding the principle of separating the Games from political interference.

  • =The IOC reiterated a "fundamental principle" that the Games must remain free from "political, religious and any other type of interference."=

Precedents and Parallels: Russian Athletes' Participation

The IOC's decision regarding Heraskevych's helmet has been scrutinized in light of its policies on Russian athletes competing in the Olympics.

Read More: Olympic Skier Breezy Johnson Gets Engaged After Race Crash

  • Ukraine's Perspective: Heraskevych noted that "Despite precedents in modern times and in the past when the IOC allowed such tributes, this time they decided to set special rules just for Ukraine."

  • IOC's Policy on Russian Athletes: Russian and Belarusian athletes are generally barred from competing for their countries in the Paris 2024 Games due to the ongoing war. However, some are allowed to participate as "individual neutral athletes."

  • This distinction has led to commentary suggesting a disparity in how national mourning and political contexts are handled. One analysis framed the IOC's allowance of Russian athletes not as fairness but as "cruelty."

  • Demonstrations: Marches have occurred, such as one in Paris, calling for the exclusion of Russian and Belarusian competitors from the Games, while also honoring Ukrainian athletes who have died.

Expert Analysis and Official Statements

Official statements from the IOC and Ukrainian representatives highlight the divergent perspectives.

Read More: Ukrainian Athlete Leaves Games Over Helmet Rule

"What we've tried to do is to address his desires with compassion and understanding," - IOC spokesman Mark Adams on the Heraskevych situation, while affirming the need to keep the Games free from political interference.

"He will be allowed to wear a black armband, it said, calling the move a compromise." - Reported IOC statement on the alternative offered to Heraskevych.

"Ukraine’s Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko condemned the ruling, calling it morally incorrect." - Summary of Ukrainian government's reaction.

Heraskevych's defiance and the support he has received underscore the emotional weight of the conflict for Ukrainian athletes. The IOC's adherence to its charter, coupled with its more nuanced approach to Russian athlete participation, forms a complex picture of its governance.

Findings and Implications

The IOC's prohibition of Vladyslav Heraskevych's memorial helmet presents a direct challenge to Ukraine's acknowledgment of its fallen athletes. The organization's adherence to rules against political expression stands in contrast to its decisions allowing Russian athletes to compete as neutrals, a situation that has drawn criticism for lacking parity.

Read More: Lindsey Vonn Hurt in Olympics; David Beckham Sends Support

  • Core Conflict: The central issue is the interpretation of what constitutes a "political statement" within the Olympic Games.

  • Heraskevych's Stance: He remains committed to wearing the helmet, indicating a potential for further escalation or disciplinary action.

  • IOC's Position: The committee appears steadfast in its application of Charter rules, offering an armband as the sole concession.

  • Broader Implications: The case highlights the difficulties the Olympic movement faces in navigating geopolitical conflicts and balancing principles of neutrality with expressions of national identity and remembrance. The perception of differential treatment between Ukrainian and Russian athletes could further strain the IOC's credibility.

Next Steps:

The immediate next step involves observing whether Heraskevych indeed wears the helmet during his official competition and what response, if any, the IOC implements. The Ukrainian Olympic Committee's appeal process will also be a key determinant.

Sources Used

Read More: Ukrainian Athlete Removed from Olympics for Helmet Honoring War Victims

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Why can't the Ukrainian athlete wear his helmet?
The Olympic Committee says the helmet has pictures that break rules about political messages during the Games.
Q: What does the athlete want to do?
He wants to wear the helmet to remember athletes who died in the war. He said he will wear it anyway.
Q: What did the Olympic Committee offer instead?
They offered him a black armband to wear, but he said no.
Q: What does Ukraine think about this?
Ukraine thinks the decision is unfair and wrong.