WASHINGTON D.C. – April 29, 2026 – In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court has effectively crippled a major component of the Voting Rights Act, voiding Louisiana's current congressional map. The ruling centers on the state's second majority-Black congressional district, which the court deemed an "unconstitutional racial gerrymander." This decision significantly narrows the ability of minority voters and advocacy groups to challenge voting maps that dilute their representation under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The state, previously directed by a lower court to create this second district after a federal judge found the initial map likely violated Section 2, now faces the task of redrawing its electoral map.
The court's majority, led by Justice Samuel Alito, asserted that while race can be a factor in map-drawing, Louisiana's creation of the district lacked a "compelling interest" justifying its race-based composition. This interpretation suggests states can rarely consider race when drawing districts to comply with Section 2, a provision designed to protect minority voters from discrimination. The decision is anticipated to embolden Republican-led states in their redistricting efforts, potentially leading to the elimination of districts favoring Black and Latino voters and impacting the balance of power in Congress.
Read More: Supreme Court Makes Voting Rights Harder for Black Voters in Louisiana
Reactions to the ruling have been starkly divided. Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill, a Republican, hailed the decision as a victory, stating it ends the "unconstitutional abuse of the Voting Rights Act." Conversely, Democratic officials and voting rights advocates decry the ruling as a significant setback. Mayor Helena Moreno of New Orleans, representing a predominantly Black district, called the decision "a step backward," emphasizing the Voting Rights Act's historical role as a safeguard for marginalized voices.
The controversy surrounding Louisiana's map originated after a previous map, featuring five majority-White districts and one majority-Black district, was challenged. A federal judge blocked its use, prompting the state to draw a new map with a second majority-Black district that stretches diagonally across the state. This new map was defended by the state last term, but this term, the court found it unconstitutional. A group of self-described "non-African-American voters" intervened to object to the legislature's redistricting after the new maps were drawn. The ruling's impact on upcoming elections, including the November midterms, remains uncertain as primaries are already underway in many states.
Read More: Supreme Court Examines TPS Decisions for Haitians and Syrians Today
