The Supreme Court of India has stepped in to clarify a significant conflict: whether the new Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act of 2023 inadvertently, or perhaps deliberately, weakens the public's fundamental right to access information. This matter is now before a Constitution Bench, indicating its gravity and the need for a definitive interpretation. At the heart of the issue lies Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act, which petitioners argue acts as a complete barrier, preventing citizens from obtaining personal information through the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The court's decision will have far-reaching implications for transparency and accountability in the digital age.
Background: A Clash of Rights
The case revolves around a petition challenging Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act, 2023. This section, according to the petitioners, imposes a "blanket ban" on RTI applicants seeking disclosure of 'personal information'. This is seen by some as a significant impediment to the RTI Act, which is a cornerstone of transparency in India.
Read More: India's Top Court Says People Are Strangers Before Marriage
The DPDP Act, 2023: Enacted to protect individuals' digital personal data and set rules for its processing.
The RTI Act, 2005: Guarantees citizens the right to access information held by public authorities, promoting transparency and accountability.
Section 44(3) of DPDP Act: The contentious provision that critics claim restricts access to personal information.
The Challenge: Petitioners argue that this provision uses the right to privacy as a shield to dismantle the people's right to know, effectively creating secrecy.
The Core Argument: Privacy Versus Transparency
Advocates for the petitioners contend that the DPDP Act, particularly Section 44(3), creates an untenable situation where the right to privacy is weaponized to obscure information that should be accessible under the RTI Act.
"The provision cynically uses the right to privacy to cripple the citizens’ right to information."
This perspective suggests that while the DPDP Act aims to protect personal data, its application in this instance undermines a different, but equally crucial, constitutional right.
Read More: Supreme Court to Decide on Women's Religious Place Entry
Petitioner's Claim: The DPDP Act's Section 44(3) imposes a "blanket ban" on RTI applicants seeking 'personal information'.
Legal Ramifications: Advocates argue this has "immediate and serious" constitutional consequences.
Analogy Used: One lawyer described the government's action as using "a hammer… to deliver body blows to citizens’ right to information" instead of a more precise tool.
Judicial Scrutiny and the Constitution Bench
The Supreme Court has recognized the complexity and sensitivity of the legal question presented. While a plea for an interim order to halt the implementation of Section 44(3) was denied, the matter has been deemed significant enough for consideration by a Constitution Bench.
Chief Justice of India's Observation: The court acknowledged the question as "complex, slightly sensitive and really interesting."
Bench Composition: The case is being heard by a three-judge Bench, now referred to a Constitution Bench.
Interim Relief Denied: A stay on the contested provision was not granted at this stage.
Broader Implications for Data Governance and Rights
This legal challenge highlights a larger debate about the balance between data protection, privacy rights, and the public's right to information, especially in the digital realm. Concerns have been raised about potential overreach and the use of data protection laws to shield information.
Read More: India Holds Big AI Meeting to Talk About Deepfakes
Data Value and Privacy: Some commentators link the loss of privacy on data to a loss of value in that data, suggesting a fundamental flaw in how data is being handled if privacy is compromised.
Governmental Powers: Provisions like Section 36 of the DPDP Act have been noted for potentially granting broad powers to the government for data requisition without explicit procedural safeguards, increasing the risk of arbitrary action.
Transparency as a Constitutional Commitment: Legal experts emphasize that the RTI Act is not merely bureaucratic procedure but a core constitutional commitment to transparency, which amendments might be extinguishing.
Expert Commentary and Analysis
Legal scholars and commentators have weighed in on the implications of the DPDP Act, particularly concerning its interaction with existing transparency laws.
"The RTI Act has been a source of accountability in the last twenty years, but Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act is extinguishing that light."
Read More: Women Face Health Risks and Prison for Abortion Denials
This sentiment reflects a concern that the new data protection law might inadvertently, or intentionally, erode established rights to information. The need to "restore the original Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act" is suggested as a path to rebalance privacy and accountability.
Conclusion and Next Steps
The Supreme Court's referral of the DPDP Act's Section 44(3) to a Constitution Bench signifies a critical juncture in India's legal landscape concerning digital rights and transparency. The core issue is whether the DPDP Act's privacy provisions are being used to subvert the public's right to know, a fundamental aspect of democratic governance. The Constitution Bench will now undertake a detailed examination of this legal contention.
Key Question: Does Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act, 2023, unconstitutionally restrict the Right to Information?
Court's Action: A Constitution Bench will now adjudicate the matter.
Implications: The ruling will shape the future interplay between data privacy laws and transparency mechanisms in India.
Read More: Vaikom Ferry Terminal Now Uses Solar Power for Boats
Sources:
The Hindu: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-refers-to-constitution-bench-on-whether-dpdp-law-uses-privacy-to-dismantle-peoples-right-to-know/article70638386.ece
Bar and Bench: https://www.barandbench.com/columns/section-443-of-the-dpdp-act-cloaking-indias-right-to-know-in-secrecy
NLS Forum: https://forum.nls.ac.in/ijlt-blog-post/privacy-surveillance-and-state-interest-appraising-the-dpdp-act-through-a-constitutional-perspective/
Youth Express: https://youthexpress.in/dpdp-act-2023-constitution-impact-on-digital-rights-privacy
