Stefon Diggs found not guilty of assault charges in Massachusetts

Stefon Diggs was found not guilty of strangulation and assault charges after a two-day trial. The jury took about 90 minutes to reach their decision.

A Massachusetts jury has delivered a swift verdict, finding free agent wide receiver Stefon Diggs not guilty on charges of felony strangulation and misdemeanor assault and battery. The decision came after approximately 90 minutes of deliberation, concluding a two-day trial in Dedham District Court. Diggs, who had pleaded not guilty to the accusations, was present for the reading of the verdict on Tuesday.

The core of the legal proceedings revolved around accusations made by Diggs' former live-in chef, Jamila Adams. Adams alleged that Diggs assaulted and choked her during a dispute over payment in December 2025. She testified that Diggs entered her room and attacked her after an argument about money he owed her. Adams claimed Diggs slapped her, then wrapped his arm around her neck, restricting her breathing.

Diggs found not guilty of assault, strangulation - 1

Trial Dynamics

During the trial, Adams described the alleged encounter, becoming emotional on the stand. However, questions were raised about her account, particularly concerning financial demands made on her behalf and her credibility. Defense attorneys for Diggs highlighted the lack of visible injuries on Adams, with one witness testifying they observed no unusual signs or marks on her neck. Adams herself admitted to not seeking medical care or taking photographs of any alleged injuries, and not discussing the incident with others in Diggs' circle.

Read More: Lakers Player Vanderbilt's Low Minutes Cause Sideline Talk

Diggs' legal team, led by attorney Mitchell Schuster, emphasized that no assault occurred. They pointed to testimony suggesting Adams appeared normal in the days following the alleged incident and did not present clear evidence of physical harm. Schuster stated after the verdict that the evidence supported their assertion that Diggs was wrongly accused.

Diggs found not guilty of assault, strangulation - 2

Broader Implications

The acquittal means Diggs has avoided the most serious legal consequences, including potential incarceration. His legal team expressed a desire for him to return to the NFL, suggesting his reputation might have been unfairly tarnished by the allegations. Diggs' attorney noted that fame and financial success can sometimes lead to players facing increased scrutiny and opportunistic targeting.

While cleared criminally, Diggs could still face potential disciplinary action from the NFL under its personal conduct policy. This policy operates independently of criminal proceedings and examines whether a player's conduct negatively impacts the league's integrity and reputation. The outcome of the trial, however, removes the immediate threat of criminal conviction and could influence his standing as a free agent in the league.

Read More: Stefon Diggs Found Not Guilty of All Charges in Boston Court

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Why was Stefon Diggs on trial in Massachusetts?
Stefon Diggs was on trial for felony strangulation and misdemeanor assault and battery charges related to an alleged incident with his former chef in December 2025. The chef claimed Diggs assaulted and choked her during a payment dispute.
Q: What was the verdict in Stefon Diggs' trial?
On Tuesday, May 5, 2026, a Massachusetts jury found Stefon Diggs not guilty of all charges after about 90 minutes of deliberation.
Q: What does the acquittal mean for Stefon Diggs?
The acquittal means Stefon Diggs will not face criminal penalties and can continue his career as a free agent. His legal team hopes this clears his name for a potential return to the NFL.
Q: Could the NFL still take action against Stefon Diggs?
Yes, the NFL can still review the case under its personal conduct policy, which is separate from criminal proceedings. This could potentially lead to league-imposed discipline, even after the criminal charges were dismissed.