Keir Starmer Says Jim Ratcliffe's Immigration Comments Are Wrong

Keir Starmer, a top political leader, has said that Jim Ratcliffe's words about the UK being 'colonised by immigrants' are offensive and not true. Starmer wants Ratcliffe, who helps own Manchester United, to say sorry. Many people disagree with Ratcliffe's comments.

Public Figures Clash Over Immigration Comments

Keir Starmer, the leader of the opposition and a prominent political figure, has publicly declared Jim Ratcliffe's statement that the United Kingdom has been "colonised by immigrants" to be "offensive and wrong." Starmer has called for an apology from the Manchester United co-owner and chairman of INEOS. The remarks, made by Ratcliffe in a recent interview, have ignited a significant debate, drawing sharp criticism from political leaders and anti-discrimination groups alike. The core of the disagreement centers on Ratcliffe's assertions about immigration levels and their perceived impact on the UK economy and society.

Keir Starmer says Jim Ratcliffe is 'offensive and wrong' as he calls on Manchester United co-owner to apologise for saying UK has been colonised by immigrants - 1

Timeline of Events and Key Statements

The controversy unfolded following an interview where Sir Jim Ratcliffe, a prominent businessman and co-owner of Manchester United, discussed what he termed "profound political, social and economic challenges" facing the UK. He specifically highlighted an "unprecedented rise in immigration."

Read More: Minister Asks to Stop New Top Job Choice Until Old Files Are Out

Keir Starmer says Jim Ratcliffe is 'offensive and wrong' as he calls on Manchester United co-owner to apologise for saying UK has been colonised by immigrants - 2
  • The Interview: Sir Jim Ratcliffe made his controversial remarks during an interview with Sky News economic editor Ed Conway, on the sidelines of the European Industry Summit in Antwerp, Belgium.

  • Ratcliffe's Core Statement: He stated, "I mean, the UK has been colonised. You can't have an economy with nine million people on benefits and huge levels of immigrants coming in." He also suggested that addressing issues like immigration and people opting for benefits over work requires "unpopular" actions and "courage."

  • Population Figures Discrepancy: Reports indicate that Ratcliffe’s claim regarding the UK population increasing from 58 million to 70 million due to immigration was inaccurate, according to figures from the Office for National Statistics.

  • Political Response:

  • Keir Starmer immediately took to social media platform X, stating, "Offensive and wrong. Jim Ratcliffe should apologise."

  • The Prime Minister echoed Starmer's sentiment, posting, "Offensive and wrong."

  • Support for Ratcliffe: Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, whom Ratcliffe mentioned meeting and described as an "intelligent man" with "good intentions," posted in support of Ratcliffe's comments.

  • Football Community Reaction: Anti-discrimination group Kick It Out described Ratcliffe's comments as "disgraceful" and stated such language has "no place in English football." The Manchester United Supporters Trust also commented that leadership remarks should "make inclusion easier, not harder."

The Central Assertions and Counterarguments

Sir Jim Ratcliffe's comments centered on the perceived strain immigration places on the UK's economy and social fabric, framing it as a "colonisation." He drew parallels between managing difficult changes at Manchester United and the leadership required to address these issues in the country.

Read More: Amazon Prime Was Faster and Saved People Money in 2025

Keir Starmer says Jim Ratcliffe is 'offensive and wrong' as he calls on Manchester United co-owner to apologise for saying UK has been colonised by immigrants - 3
  • Ratcliffe's Argument:

  • He argued that the UK faces significant challenges, including an "unprecedented rise in immigration."

  • He linked immigration to the number of people on benefits, suggesting a strain on the economy.

  • He suggested that tackling these issues requires courage and the willingness to take unpopular actions, drawing parallels with his approach at Manchester United.

  • He also commented on the political landscape, calling Nigel Farage "intelligent" and suggesting Keir Starmer might be "too nice" to implement necessary, albeit unpopular, changes.

  • Counterarguments and Rebuttals:

  • Keir Starmer and the Prime Minister strongly condemned the remarks as "offensive and wrong."

  • They emphasized Britain as a "proud, tolerant and diverse country."

  • Critics, including football anti-discrimination bodies, labeled the comments "disgraceful" and divisive, highlighting the positive contributions of immigrants.

  • Questions were raised about the accuracy of his population statistics.

  • Fan groups at Manchester United expressed concern that such comments could alienate supporters and undermine the club's inclusive values.

Business and Political Context

Sir Jim Ratcliffe, founder and chairman of INEOS, one of the world's largest chemical companies, is a significant figure in both business and sports. His relocation to tax-free Monaco in 2020, following his vocal support for Brexit, has also drawn attention, especially in light of his recent comments and the fact that his company received substantial UK state aid.

Read More: Minister and Mayor Disagree with Businessman on Immigration

Keir Starmer says Jim Ratcliffe is 'offensive and wrong' as he calls on Manchester United co-owner to apologise for saying UK has been colonised by immigrants - 4
  • Ratcliffe's Background:

  • Founder and chairman of INEOS.

  • Moved tax residency to Monaco in 2020 after backing Brexit.

  • Received £120 million in UK state aid recently.

  • His tenure at Manchester United has involved significant changes, some of which have been unpopular with fans, such as layoffs and managerial decisions.

  • Broader Discussion on Immigration: The comments tap into an ongoing and often contentious debate about immigration levels, economic impact, and national identity in the UK. Ratcliffe's assertion of "colonisation" is a particularly strong and provocative framing of this issue.

  • Political Implications: The controversy highlights a divide in how immigration is perceived and discussed among political leaders and prominent public figures. Starmer's firm condemnation signals a clear opposition to Ratcliffe's viewpoint, while Nigel Farage's support aligns with a more restrictionist stance on immigration.

Expert and Community Reactions

Beyond political leaders, various groups have weighed in on Sir Jim Ratcliffe's statements, reflecting a range of perspectives on immigration and its portrayal.

Read More: UK Economy Grew Very Little at End of 2025

  • Anti-Discrimination Bodies: Kick It Out and other groups have strongly criticized Ratcliffe's language, warning of its potential to legitimize prejudice and deepen societal divisions. They emphasize the importance of inclusive rhetoric, particularly within the context of sports.

  • Manchester United Fan Groups: Groups like the Manchester United Supporters Trust have voiced concern that remarks from club leadership should foster inclusivity, not create barriers. Some fan commentary suggests Ratcliffe is "completely out of touch" with the club's fanbase.

  • Political Analysts: Some commentators have suggested Ratcliffe's remarks reflect a desire to portray himself as a decisive leader capable of making tough decisions, a persona he seems to be projecting both in business and politics, even by comparing himself to or contrasting himself with figures like Keir Starmer and Nigel Farage.

Conclusion and Unanswered Questions

Sir Jim Ratcliffe's declaration that the UK has been "colonised by immigrants" has prompted a significant public backlash, led by Keir Starmer and the Prime Minister, who have demanded an apology. The incident underscores the sensitive nature of discussions surrounding immigration in the UK and highlights a stark contrast in viewpoints between prominent figures in business, politics, and sport.

Read More: Jim Ratcliffe Criticized for Immigration Comments

  • Key Findings:

  • Sir Jim Ratcliffe used the term "colonised by immigrants" to describe the UK's situation, linking it to economic challenges and benefit claims.

  • Keir Starmer and the Prime Minister have labeled these comments "offensive and wrong" and called for an apology.

  • Ratcliffe's remarks have been condemned by anti-discrimination groups and met with concern by Manchester United fan organizations.

  • There are indications of factual inaccuracies in Ratcliffe's statements regarding UK population figures.

  • Ratcliffe also commented on political figures, including Nigel Farage and Keir Starmer.

  • Outstanding Matters:

  • Will Sir Jim Ratcliffe issue an apology as demanded?

  • What are the broader implications of these comments for his role at Manchester United and his standing within the business community?

  • How will this exchange influence the ongoing public discourse on immigration and national identity in the UK?

Sources Used

Read More: Companies Need to Build Strength into Daily Work

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What did Jim Ratcliffe say?
Jim Ratcliffe said that the UK has been 'colonised by immigrants.' He also said that the UK has too many people on benefits and too many immigrants.
Q: Who is Jim Ratcliffe?
Jim Ratcliffe is a businessman who owns part of Manchester United football club. He also leads a big company called INEOS.
Q: What did Keir Starmer say about it?
Keir Starmer, a leader in politics, said Ratcliffe's words were 'offensive and wrong.' He asked Ratcliffe to say sorry.
Q: Did anyone else comment on this?
Yes, the Prime Minister also said the comments were 'offensive and wrong.' Some groups that fight against unfairness and fans of Manchester United also said the comments were bad and not helpful.