Star Trek Starfleet Academy Review Bombing Could Harm Franchise Future

Star Trek: Starfleet Academy has received 5,200 reviews for its first episode, with many critics calling it 'review bombing'. This could impact the future of the entire Star Trek franchise.
By Newsroom | Entertainment, Science Fiction |

Online reviews for the new Star Trek: Starfleet Academy series are being described as "review-bombed," with some concerned this trend could harm the entire franchise. Reports suggest that negative, often unfounded, reviews are appearing in large numbers, prompting discussions about the impact on Star Trek's longevity and creative direction.

Public Reaction and Allegations of Review Bombing

Since its debut on Paramount+, Star Trek: Starfleet Academy has encountered a notable surge in online reviews, many of which are flagged as negative. Reports from January 2026 indicate a significant volume of reviews on platforms like IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes.

  • The series premiered with its first two episodes.

  • One report noted 5,200 reviews for the first episode.

  • Some viewers have voiced opinions that the show is "too woke," citing concerns about female characters and LGBTQ+ representation.

Concerns for the Star Trek Franchise

Industry observers and some involved in the production have raised alarms about the potential consequences of such online behavior. The argument is that a consistent pattern of negative review bombing could signal a lack of audience engagement or outright disapproval, impacting future Star Trek projects.

Read More: Kate Walsh Shares Sadness Over Eric Dane's Death from ALS at 53

Oh No! 'Review-Bombing Starfleet Academy Could End the Franchise' - 1

  • A technical artist for Star Trek stated that negative review bombing could "ice Trek for the next decade."

  • Concerns have been raised that if Starfleet Academy "underperforms," the long-term effects on Star Trek are "uncertain."

  • The debate is seen as part of a broader issue of franchise fatigue within the entertainment industry.

"Has unfair review bombing ever killed something that was genuinely good?" - Twitchy.com

"The Real Threat to Star Trek Isn’t the Fans It’s creative stagnation under constant production pressure." - Geeks + Gamers

Examining the Review Data and Audience Reception

While allegations of review bombing are prominent, understanding the show's actual performance is key. Data points suggest that the series may not be reaching the broad audience some might expect, independent of review scores.

  • Despite new episode releases, the show reportedly "doesn’t even chart on the streaming service’s own top 10 list."

  • The premiere episodes also "failed to chart on the Nielsen top 10 list" during their debut week.

Differing Perspectives on the Cause and Effect

Explanations for the online backlash and its potential impact vary. Some point to specific creative decisions or the show's content, while others suggest the review bombing itself is the primary issue.

Allegations of Bias and Content Criticism

  • Concerns about "wokeness": Some reviews reportedly express dissatisfaction with what is perceived as excessive focus on social or political themes, such as "women who aren't sex objects and positive LGBTQ+ representation."

  • Fan expectations: A counterpoint suggests fans are not obligated to endorse "subpar shows" simply because they carry the Star Trek brand.

Alternative Interpretations and Systemic Issues

  • Creative leadership: One viewpoint questions why blame isn't directed at Alex Kurtzman, suggesting a lack of oversight in creative direction.

  • Creative stagnation: An alternative argument posits that "creative stagnation under constant production pressure" is a greater threat than fan reviews.

  • Historical context: The revival of the original Star Trek after a period of dormancy is cited as evidence that pauses do not necessarily signify the end of a franchise.

Expert and Industry Commentary

Commentators and individuals within the Star Trek sphere have offered their views on the situation.

  • One report quotes a technical artist who claims that "negative review bombing" of Starfleet Academy could negatively affect Star Trek for a significant period.

  • Another analysis suggests the review bombing is "sad but not surprising," linking it to a recurring pattern of criticism against projects perceived as too "woke."

  • Some analyses differentiate between legitimate criticism and "review bombing," noting that individual negative reviews are one thing, but coordinated, potentially malicious attacks are another.

Conclusions and Future Outlook

The situation surrounding Star Trek: Starfleet Academy highlights a complex interplay between fan reception, online review culture, and the commercial pressures faced by major entertainment franchises.

  • Evidence of review bombing: Multiple sources report a significant influx of negative reviews, some explicitly labeled as "review bombing."

  • Potential franchise impact: Concerns are voiced that this trend, if sustained, could influence the future production and viability of Star Trek content.

  • Audience engagement data: Initial viewership data suggests the show may not be achieving high engagement, raising questions about its success independent of review scores.

  • Underlying causes: The reasons for the negative reception and the review bombing are debated, with factors ranging from content and perceived "wokeness" to broader issues of creative direction and franchise fatigue.

  • Uncertainty remains: The long-term implications for the Star Trek franchise remain a subject of discussion, with some suggesting that past resilience indicates potential for future recovery.

Sources Used:

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is happening with the online reviews for Star Trek: Starfleet Academy?
The new Star Trek: Starfleet Academy series is facing many negative online reviews that some people call 'review bombing'. This means many bad reviews are being posted quickly, possibly unfairly.
Q: Why are some people calling the reviews 'review bombing'?
Reports from January 2026 show a large number of negative reviews for the show on sites like IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes. Some viewers say the show is 'too woke' because of its focus on female characters and LGBTQ+ people.
Q: How could this affect the Star Trek franchise?
A technical artist for Star Trek said that this 'review bombing' could stop new Star Trek shows for the next ten years. If Starfleet Academy does not do well, the future of other Star Trek projects is uncertain.
Q: Is the show actually doing poorly, or is it just the reviews?
The show has not been doing well on streaming charts. Even with new episodes, it has not appeared on Paramount+'s top 10 list or the Nielsen top 10 list in its first week.
Q: What are different opinions on why this is happening?
Some people think the show's content, like its focus on social themes, is the problem. Others believe the 'review bombing' itself is the main issue. Some also think that creative leadership or 'franchise fatigue' are bigger problems than fan reviews.