A recent report details allegations that the Pueblo D70 school board may have skirted open meeting requirements, sparking contention among its members and raising questions about transparency in its operations. The specifics of these alleged violations, as outlined by Dennis Maes and amplified by the Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition, center on a complaint filed with the Colorado Attorney General.
The core of the dispute involves a criminal complaint lodged with Attorney General Phil Weiser's office by educator Chris Sutton. This complaint targets both board member Miller and Education reEnvisioned BOCES (ERBOCES). Sutton alleges a bribery scheme, specifically that Miller and ERBOCES offered a former board director, Anne Ochs, a substantial salary prior to her vote on a memorandum of understanding (MOU) concerning Riverstone Academy's placement.
Amidst these legalistic entanglements, recent board meetings have been marked by a stated desire for improved collaboration. Following two contentious sessions, Pueblo D70 educator Ellen MacIndoe noted a perceived singular focus from Miller, suggesting an interest in serving as legal counsel only to board member Bennett, rather than the wider board.
Read More: Third Labor Department Aide Melissa Robey Placed on Leave Amid Misconduct Probe
Board member Bennett has publicly addressed past affiliations with Forging Education, a nonprofit associated with the conservative organization Forging Pueblo, which operates private Christian schools. Bennett has denied any conflict of interest stemming from these connections.
The broader context involves efforts to move past recent internal friction. The discourse surrounding these alleged violations and personal business dealings creates a complex backdrop for the board's stated aim of future cooperation.