Mark Zuckerberg to Tell Jury How Instagram Affects Young People

Mark Zuckerberg will testify in a major trial about social media's impact on kids. This is the first time he will speak to a jury about these issues.
By Newsroom | Technology, Law |

Mark Zuckerberg, the chief executive of Meta, is scheduled to testify in a significant trial that examines whether social media platforms, particularly Meta's Instagram, are designed to addict and harm young users. This case represents a pivotal moment, as it is the first time Zuckerberg will personally address a jury about the safety of his company's widely used products. The proceedings are drawing considerable attention, with the core of the legal challenge centering on allegations that companies like Meta and Google deliberately engineered their platforms to foster compulsive engagement among children, potentially leading to severe mental health consequences.

Mark Zuckerberg set to testify in watershed social media trial - 1

Background of the Litigation

The trial is one of several lawsuits filed against major social media companies, accusing them of knowingly creating addictive products that negatively impact young users' mental well-being.

Mark Zuckerberg set to testify in watershed social media trial - 2

  • Plaintiff's Claims: The lawsuit, brought by a woman identified as K.G.M., alleges that her mental health worsened with increased use of social media platforms, including Instagram. It is stated that despite her mother's attempts to limit her access through third-party software, the design of these platforms allowed K.G.M. to bypass parental controls. The suit further claims that programming decisions were made with the intent of making K.G.M. dependent on these services, leading to issues like depression and suicidal thoughts. During her use of Instagram, K.G.M. reportedly experienced bullying and sextortion, with uncertainty regarding the perpetrator's identity and connection to her.

  • Defendants' Position: Meta, the parent company of Instagram and Facebook, and Google (owner of YouTube) are the remaining defendants in this Los Angeles Superior Court trial. Meta has asserted that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is confident that the evidence will demonstrate its long-standing commitment to supporting young people. Attorneys for Meta have acknowledged that K.G.M. experienced mental health struggles but contest that Instagram was a substantial cause of these issues. Meta's Adam Mosseri, head of Instagram, testified that he disagrees with the notion of clinical addiction to social media and stated that the company aims to protect young users, suggesting it is not in Meta's long-term interest to make decisions detrimental to user well-being.

  • Settlements: Prior to the trial, TikTok and Snap reached settlements with the plaintiff in this California state case. The terms of these settlements have not been disclosed.

Key Figures and Testimonies

The trial is expected to feature testimony from high-ranking executives, with Zuckerberg's appearance being a central focus.

Read More: How the eSafety Commissioner's Power Was Limited in Online Speech Case

Mark Zuckerberg set to testify in watershed social media trial - 3

  • Mark Zuckerberg's Testimony: As the 41-year-old CEO of Meta, Zuckerberg is a highly anticipated witness. His testimony will be the first time he directly addresses a jury regarding the safety of his company's platforms. He was compelled to testify by a Los Angeles Superior Court judge, overcoming Meta's motion to prevent his appearance.

  • Adam Mosseri's Testimony: The head of Instagram has already testified in the trial. During his testimony, Mosseri stated his disagreement with the concept of social media addiction and emphasized the company's efforts to protect young users. He also addressed the issue of cosmetic filters on Instagram, a topic expected to be revisited with Zuckerberg.

  • Neal Mohan's Expected Testimony: YouTube CEO Neal Mohan was also slated to testify, but plaintiff's attorneys indicated they would call another YouTube executive instead.

The trial aims to address fundamental questions about the design and impact of social media on young individuals.

Read More: Former Daily Mail reporter denies spying on Baroness Lawrence which could cost the newspaper millions

Mark Zuckerberg set to testify in watershed social media trial - 4

  • Platform Design and Addiction: A core issue is whether Meta and Google deliberately designed their platforms to encourage compulsive use among young people.

  • Harm to Mental Health: The trial will examine whether this design has contributed to damaging the mental health of young users.

  • Parental Controls and Evasion: The ease with which minors can allegedly bypass parental controls is another point of contention.

Trial Context and Significance

This case is considered a "watershed" or "landmark" trial due to its potential to set precedents for how social media companies are held accountable for the effects of their products on younger users. The inclusion of CEO testimonies underscores the seriousness and high stakes of the proceedings. The jury selection process itself highlighted the public's strong feelings, with Meta's lawyers seeking to exclude potential jurors deemed hostile to Zuckerberg.

Expert and Attributed Insights

While direct expert analysis is limited in the provided text, the accounts from the trial and legal filings offer signals:

Read More: How X Platform Outage on January 16, 2026, Affected Users Worldwide

  • Plaintiff's attorney Mark Lanier has focused questioning on aspects like cosmetic filters, indicating a strategy to connect platform features directly to user self-perception and potential psychological effects.

  • Meta's legal team, represented by Paul Schmidt, acknowledges K.G.M.'s struggles but disputes the causal link to Instagram's design, suggesting a defense strategy that may point to other contributing factors.

Conclusion and Implications

Mark Zuckerberg's upcoming testimony is a crucial development in a trial that could significantly influence the social media industry's approach to child safety and platform design. The legal battle is poised to scrutinize whether major technology firms bear responsibility for the mental health challenges faced by young users who engage with their products. The outcome may have far-reaching implications, potentially leading to stricter regulations or shifts in platform development if plaintiffs succeed in proving deliberate design choices led to harm. The companies maintain their commitment to user safety, while plaintiffs argue that their products are inherently designed for compulsive engagement that can be detrimental.

Read More: Frank Stronach sexual assault trial begins with emotional testimony from former employees

Sources:

Read More: Why PlayStation 6 Launch Could Be Delayed Until 2029 Due to AI Memory Demand

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Why is Mark Zuckerberg testifying in a trial?
Mark Zuckerberg, the boss of Meta, will speak to a jury for the first time about claims that Instagram and other social media platforms hurt young people. The trial looks at if these platforms are designed to make kids addicted.
Q: What are the main claims against Meta and Google in this trial?
The lawsuit says Meta (Instagram) and Google (YouTube) made their apps to hook young users and cause harm to their mental health. It claims these companies made choices to make kids use their apps a lot, even when parents tried to limit access.
Q: What does Meta say about these claims?
Meta says it strongly disagrees with the claims. The company states it is committed to helping young people and believes the evidence will show this. Meta's head of Instagram, Adam Mosseri, testified that he does not believe people can be clinically addicted to social media.
Q: Who is the trial about and what happened to them?
The trial focuses on a person named K.G.M., who says her mental health got worse from using social media like Instagram. She claims the app's design made her dependent and led to problems like depression and suicidal thoughts. She also faced bullying and sextortion on the platform.
Q: Did any companies settle before the trial?
Yes, TikTok and Snap have already settled with the person suing. The details of these settlements were not made public.
Q: What is the big deal about this trial?
This trial is seen as very important because it could set new rules for how social media companies are responsible for the safety of young users. If the people suing win, it might lead to changes in how social media apps are made and used by kids.