Lib Dems Want New 'Growth Department' Instead of Treasury

The Liberal Democrats have a new idea to change how the government handles money. They want to close the Treasury and start a new 'Department for Growth' in Birmingham. This new department would focus on helping the economy grow and making life less expensive for people.

A significant shift in economic governance is being proposed by the Liberal Democrats, who advocate for the dismantling of the current Treasury and the establishment of a new "Department for Growth." This proposed body, envisioned to be located in Birmingham, would aim to reorient the government's focus towards long-term economic prosperity and a reduction in the cost of living.

Lib Dems set out plan to replace Treasury with ‘Department for Growth’ - 1

The Liberal Democrats have unveiled a plan to fundamentally alter the structure of the UK's economic decision-making apparatus. At the core of this proposal is the replacement of the long-standing Treasury with a new entity named the "Department for Growth." This proposed department would be responsible for key economic functions, including setting taxes, overseeing economic strategy, establishing fiscal rules, and approving significant infrastructure projects. The party asserts that such a move is necessary to address what they perceive as the Treasury's "anti-growth" stance and to foster stronger economic development. A key element of the proposal is the relocation of this new department to Birmingham, signifying a move to decentralize power from London.

Read More: MDMK Wants More Seats to Get Official Recognition

Lib Dems set out plan to replace Treasury with ‘Department for Growth’ - 2

Background to the Proposal

The idea of restructuring the UK's economic departments is not entirely novel. Historical precedents suggest attempts to create separate bodies for long-term economic strategy.

Lib Dems set out plan to replace Treasury with ‘Department for Growth’ - 3
  • Past Initiatives: The proposal echoes initiatives from the past, such as Harold Wilson's creation of a Department for Economic Affairs in the 1960s.

  • This department was intended to manage long-term economic strategy.

  • It existed for five years before being reintegrated into the Treasury.

  • Reports suggest it faced challenges and was eventually seen as losing influence to the Treasury.

  • Current Context: The Liberal Democrats are presenting this plan as a response to current economic challenges, including the cost of living crisis.

  • Daisy Cooper, the Deputy Leader of the Liberal Democrats, has been a prominent voice in advocating for this change, criticizing the Treasury's perceived focus.

  • The proposal is presented as a means to prioritize growth, improve living standards, and offer a tangible solution to the cost of living issues.

Key Tenets of the 'Department for Growth'

The proposed "Department for Growth" would carry a distinct set of responsibilities and a stated objective of boosting the national economy.

Read More: UK Economy Grew Very Little at End of 2025

Lib Dems set out plan to replace Treasury with ‘Department for Growth’ - 4
  • Mandate: The department's primary goal would be to "boost long-term prosperity, improve living standards and end the cost-of-living crisis."

  • Powers: It would be empowered to:

  • Set tax policies.

  • Oversee the nation's economic strategy.

  • Establish fiscal rules governing government spending and borrowing.

  • Approve major infrastructure developments.

  • Location: A specific element of the plan is the establishment of this department in Birmingham. This is intended to spread economic power and focus on growth outside of London.

Economic Policy Stance

The Liberal Democrats' broader economic platform, as outlined in various policy discussions, provides context for this proposed restructuring.

  • Taxation Strategy: The party has indicated a preference for taxing entities like banks and large tech companies, rather than increasing taxes on the general public.

  • This includes a proposal to reverse tax cuts for major banks.

  • They also propose a windfall tax on the profits of oil and gas companies.

  • There is an emphasis on not increasing National Insurance, income tax, or VAT.

  • Spending and Investment: The party has presented plans for significant spending increases, with a stated figure of £27 billion.

  • They claim these plans are to be funded through their proposed tax measures.

  • They express confidence in their revenue estimates but acknowledge general uncertainties in economic forecasts.

  • Concerns have been raised about the feasibility of achieving the projected returns from investment in tax collection agencies like HMRC.

  • Public Services and Trade: The party has also drawn attention to potential cuts to public services, linking them to trade deals and economic performance.

  • They have highlighted £4.5 billion in "hidden" cuts to departments.

  • They suggest that improved UK-EU trade arrangements could help avoid such cuts.

Historical Parallels and Challenges

While the Liberal Democrats are presenting a new vision, the concept of restructuring economic departments has historical precedent, which offers insights into potential challenges.

Read More: Gen Z's Big Test: Can Young Voters Change Bangladesh?

  • The Department for Economic Affairs (DEA): Established in the 1960s, the DEA aimed to coordinate economic planning.

  • It was eventually absorbed back into the Treasury.

  • Observers noted that it struggled to assert its authority against the established Treasury, suggesting potential difficulties in any new department asserting dominance.

  • "Turf Wars": The historical experience indicates that established institutions can exert considerable influence, potentially hindering the effectiveness of new bodies created to oversee similar or overlapping areas of policy.

Analysis and Expert Perspectives

The proposal has generated discussion regarding its potential impact on economic management and the broader political landscape.

  • Focus on Growth: Supporters argue that a dedicated "Department for Growth" would ensure a sustained and central focus on economic expansion, which they believe is currently lacking.

  • This could lead to more cohesive policies aimed at long-term prosperity.

  • Decentralization: The choice of Birmingham as a location highlights a push for regional economic development and a move away from the concentration of power in Whitehall.

  • Institutional Inertia: Critics and analysts might question whether a new department could overcome the inherent inertia and established influence of the Treasury, a powerful and historically significant part of the government.

  • The success of such a restructuring would likely depend on political will and the ability to clearly delineate responsibilities.

Conclusion and Future Implications

The Liberal Democrats' proposal to replace the Treasury with a "Department for Growth" represents a significant re-imagining of economic governance in the UK. The plan aims to shift the national economic agenda towards growth, prosperity, and a reduction in living costs, with a symbolic decentralization to Birmingham.

Read More: UK Trade Gap for Goods Is Biggest Ever

  • Key Action: The party is advocating for the creation of a new government department with broad economic powers.

  • Stated Goals: The overarching aims are to stimulate long-term economic growth, enhance living standards, and alleviate the cost of living crisis.

  • Considerations: The proposal's success would depend on its political feasibility, its ability to demonstrate clear advantages over the current structure, and its capacity to navigate the complex dynamics of governmental institutions. The historical precedent of the Department for Economic Affairs provides a point of reference for the challenges such a structural change might encounter.

Sources

Read More: Minister Asks to Stop Firing Top Civil Servant While New Papers Come Out

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What do the Liberal Democrats want to do?
They want to close the Treasury and create a new 'Department for Growth'.
Q: Where would this new department be?
It would be in Birmingham, not London.
Q: Why do they want to do this?
They think it will help the economy grow and make things cheaper for people.
Q: What would the new department do?
It would set taxes, plan the economy, and approve big building projects.