Carmakers operating in Australia are facing potential penalties and significant financial obligations due to new, stricter emission standards for vehicles. The first reporting period under the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) has revealed that a number of manufacturers have not met the set targets, creating a system of credits and liabilities. While some companies have successfully generated credits by exceeding targets, others are now at risk of substantial fines if they cannot improve their emissions performance. This situation presents a clear challenge for the automotive industry in Australia, as it navigates evolving environmental regulations and consumer expectations.

Background on the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES)
Australia's NVES, which began on January 1, 2025, aims to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from new vehicles. The standard sets limits on the average CO2 emissions per kilometer for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles. The targets have been progressively tightened; for instance, the emissions limit for passenger cars has dropped from 141g/km to 117g/km.
Read More: Small Particles Move Differently Than Expected in Fluids, New Study Shows

The scheme operates by issuing credits to carmakers that achieve emissions below the set target. Conversely, those exceeding the target incur a liability. These credits can be traded between manufacturers, offering a mechanism for companies to offset their emissions or generate income. The first reporting period, covering July 1 to December 31, 2025, has concluded, and the results are now being evaluated, with official announcements expected in February 2026.

Manufacturers Exceeding and Missing Targets
The initial six months of the NVES have shown varied results across the industry. In this period, car companies collectively earned approximately 17.2 million credits by surpassing their emission reduction goals. However, a significant portion of manufacturers did not meet the targets.

Companies Missing Targets: Nineteen companies have fallen short of the initial targets. These firms face a combined potential liability of 1.3 million tonnes of excess emissions.
Notable Brands: Among the companies that missed their initial targets are Hyundai, General Motors, Honda, Porsche, Ferrari, and Jaguar.
Successful Brands: Conversely, brands like Toyota, Volkswagen, and Kia have managed to exceed their targets, generating credits. This suggests that a transition to lower-emission vehicles is achievable within the current framework for some manufacturers.
"Two-thirds of car makers beat their emissions targets, including brands like Toyota that had flagged concerns that the scheme could be too punishing on an industry that planned production three years in advance, and would have little time to adjust."
Financial Implications and Potential Fines
The non-compliance with NVES targets carries significant financial consequences for car manufacturers.
Potential Fines: Companies that fail to meet their targets could be compelled to purchase credits from those that have exceeded them or face direct penalties.
Estimated Liability: Industry bodies have projected substantial financial impacts. The peak automotive body has suggested that car brands could collectively face a bill of up to $2.8 billion under the new regulations.
Price Increases: Some manufacturers have already indicated that they will pass on the costs associated with NVES compliance to consumers. Brands such as Hyundai and Ford have reportedly begun increasing prices, a strategy attributed to the costs of penalties or the investment required to meet future targets.
"However, top brands have warned that prices in showrooms will rise to pay for the fines, something the likes of Hyundai and Ford have already begun to do."
Industry Reactions and Future Adjustments
The introduction of the NVES has prompted varied reactions and strategic adjustments within the automotive sector.
Read More: Rivian R1 Owners Can Now Use Apple Watch for Car Controls and Digital Key Starting February 19, 2026
Industry Concerns: Auto industry experts like Matt Hobbs have pointed out that some carmakers face a substantial challenge in altering their vehicle offerings for the Australian market. He notes that manufacturers plan production years in advance, making rapid adjustments to meet new emission standards difficult.
Calls for Government Support: The MTAA (Motor Trades Association of Australia), represented by CEO Matt Hobbs, has urged the government to provide support for dealers and assist manufacturers in adapting to the NVES.
Strategic Shifts: To avoid liabilities, car companies are exploring several avenues:
Introducing more low-emission and electric vehicles.
Adopting new vehicle technologies.
Reducing production of high-emission models.
Potentially exiting the Australian market if compliance becomes unfeasible.
Consumer Impact: There is a concern that Australian car buyers may penalize manufacturers financially through their purchasing decisions if price increases become excessive due to emission compliance costs.
Classifications of Vehicles Under NVES
The NVES categorizes vehicles into two main types, each with its own emission targets:
Type 1 Vehicles: This category includes passenger cars and SUVs. The average emissions for these vehicles were 114g/km, compared to a target of 144g/km.
Type 2 Vehicles: This group comprises utes, vans, small trucks, and certain rugged SUVs with higher towing capacities. Their average emissions were 199g/km, against a target of 214g/km.
Specific Model Data: While overall averages are published, detailed data on specific models has also emerged. For example, in the initial period, models like the Ford Ranger bi-turbo and Isuzu D-Max remained within the compliance limits, suggesting that some less efficient vehicles can still be sold without incurring penalties, particularly under the initially lenient targets. However, projections indicate that some well-selling brands may struggle to meet future targets.
Conclusion and Forward Outlook
The initial phase of Australia's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard has established a clear divide between car manufacturers that are meeting emission targets and those that are not. The data released highlights a group of 19 companies facing potential liabilities, with names such as Mazda and Nissan frequently cited as being among those with the largest challenges. Conversely, brands like BYD are recognized as significant beneficiaries, likely due to their focus on electric vehicles.
The potential financial penalties, estimated to be in the billions, underscore the seriousness of the NVES. Furthermore, the indications that some carmakers are already increasing prices signal a possible shift in the Australian automotive market, where consumers might bear the brunt of compliance costs. The next two-and-a-half years will be critical for the manufacturers that have missed their targets, as they must substantially improve their performance to avoid accumulating further liabilities and potential fines. The industry's response, including product portfolio adjustments and potential market exits, will continue to be closely monitored as the NVES evolves.
Read More: DC Mayor Declares Emergency Over Potomac Sewage Spill and Asks for Federal Help
Sources:
The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/feb/18/carmakers-face-possible-heavy-fines-in-australia-for-failing-to-meet-climate-targets (Summary: Carmakers in Australia could face significant fines for not meeting new climate targets for vehicles. Some companies earned credits by exceeding targets, while 19 others missed them, facing potential penalties for excess pollution. Brands like Hyundai, General Motors, Honda, Porsche, Ferrari, and Jaguar are among those that missed targets.)
ABC News: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-18/new-vehicle-efficiency-standard-results-mazda-nissan-penalties/106358770 (Summary: Mazda and Nissan are among carmakers facing penalties under Australia's new emission laws. The NVES has tightened, with emission limits for passenger cars reduced. While many carmakers met targets, some face substantial challenges and liabilities. Toyota and Volkswagen were among those that successfully generated credits.)
Drive.com.au: https://www.drive.com.au/news/mazda-nissan-top-list-of-car-brands-that-didnt-meet-australian-co2-rules/ (Summary: Mazda and Nissan are leading the list of car brands that did not meet Australia's CO2 emission rules. BYD is noted as the biggest winner. Average emissions for Type 1 and Type 2 vehicles were below their respective targets, but top brands warn of price increases to cover fines. The scheme targets passenger cars/SUVs and utes/vans/trucks.)
news.com.au: https://www.news.com.au/technology/motoring/australian-carmakers-face-reckoning-as-new-emissions-rules-expose-dirtiest-brands/news-story/615badd8868611170793a663e122bc6c (Summary: Australian carmakers are facing a reckoning due to new emissions rules that are exposing brands with higher pollution levels. The article suggests that consumers may react negatively to price increases aimed at covering compliance costs. The introduction of more electric, hybrid, and efficient options is seen as a benefit to buyers.)
Carexpert.com.au: https://www.carexpert.com.au/car-news/car-brands-face-2-8-billion-bill-under-new-emissions-regulations-peak-body (Summary: Car brands could face a $2.8 billion bill under new emissions regulations, according to the peak body. The body claims no brands are set to meet the Type 1 passenger vehicle target, and predicts several major brands will miss the Type 2 target as well. They have called for greater protections for car dealers due to increased costs for carmakers.)
Afma.org.au: https://afma.org.au/car-brands-could-face-2-8-billion-in-fines-due-to-nves/ (Summary: Car brands might face fines totaling $2.8 billion due to the NVES. The MTAA CEO is urging government support for dealers and manufacturers during the transition. Companies have options to avoid fines, including introducing low-emission vehicles, adopting new technologies, or buying credits. Some manufacturers are already taking steps to comply.)
Whichcar.com.au: https://www.whichcar.com.au/news/federal-government-name-shame-car-makers-failing-meet-co2-targets (Summary: The Australian federal government will name and shame carmakers that fail to meet new CO2 targets under the NVES, implemented from January 1, 2025. Manufacturers face penalties for non-compliance. The first reporting period was from July 1 to December 31, 2025, with results expected in February 2026. Some manufacturers have already warned of passing on costs to consumers.)
Carsguide.com.au: https://www.carsguide.com.au/car-news/car-brands-to-be-named-and-shamed-in-2026-100479 (Summary: Car brands failing to meet Australia's tightening CO2 emission targets will be named and shamed in 2026. Ford, Hyundai, and Nissan are mentioned as having already increased prices. The report will show each carmaker's 'interim emissions value' (IEV). Credits are awarded for exceeding targets and can be used to offset pollution or sold to other manufacturers.)