DHS $220 Million Ad Contract Under Fire For Kristi Noem Ties

The Department of Homeland Security awarded a $220 million advertising contract, but lawmakers are questioning the process and the companies chosen.
By Newsroom | Government, Politics |

Homeland Security Contracts Face Democratic Probes Over Alleged Ties

Democrats are scrutinizing companies that received a $220 million advertising contract from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), citing concerns over potential connections to Kristi Noem, the current Secretary of Homeland Security, and Corey Lewandowski, a figure linked to past presidential campaigns. The core of the inquiry centers on how the contracts were awarded, particularly to firms allegedly established shortly before receiving substantial government funding.

Allegations of Favored Contracting

Lawmakers have raised alarms regarding the process by which limited competition was employed for these contracts. A notice from DHS indicated a restricted bidding process involving only four companies, justified by an urgent need to address immigration. This approach has drawn criticism for potentially bypassing standard accountability measures designed to prevent impropriety and safeguard public funds.

  • Concerns have been voiced that companies awarded significant portions of the contract, such as one incorporated just 11 days before securing a $143 million deal, may not have been adequately positioned to fulfill such obligations.

  • These issues were brought to the forefront during recent Senate hearings, where Secretary Noem faced direct questioning from members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The Strategy Group and Its Connections

Further complicating the landscape is the reported connection between the awarded contracts and The Strategy Group, a firm described as having close ties to Noem's political operations. Public reporting suggests a financial link between this firm and the DHS ad spending.

Read More: US House orders Pentagon review of tick bioweapon experiments from 1950-1975

  • The Strategy Group's CEO is married to Tricia McLaughlin, who serves as Noem's chief spokesperson at DHS.

  • While Noem has stated she does not "combine" her political and governmental roles, these familial and professional links have fueled suspicions about the contracting process.

Wider Ramifications and Past Controversies

The current investigation unfolds against a backdrop of ongoing scrutiny concerning political finance and ethical standards. Figures like Lewandowski have frequently been subjects of inquiry regarding their involvement in political funding and business dealings. The intensity of this scrutiny suggests potential political repercussions that could extend beyond this particular contract.

"It troubles me… that a fifth to a quarter-billion dollars of taxpayer money, when we're scratching for every penny, and we're fighting over recision packages…I just can't agree with." - Senator Kennedy

The ads themselves, funded by the contract, prominently featured Noem, including imagery filmed at Mount Rushmore. The selection of companies and the contracting procedures are now subjects of intense examination by both Democratic and Republican lawmakers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Why are Democrats questioning the Department of Homeland Security's $220 million advertising contract?
Democrats are questioning the contract because they are concerned about potential links between the companies that received the money and Kristi Noem, the Secretary of Homeland Security. They also question how the contracts were given out, especially to new companies.
Q: What specific concerns do lawmakers have about the companies that got DHS contracts?
Lawmakers are worried that some companies were created only a short time before getting large government contracts. For example, one company got $143 million just 11 days after it was formed, raising questions about its ability to do the work.
Q: How is The Strategy Group connected to this DHS contract issue?
The Strategy Group, a firm with reported links to Noem's political work, is connected because its CEO is married to Noem's chief spokesperson at DHS. This raises questions about potential favoritism in awarding the contracts.
Q: What did Senator Kennedy say about the DHS contract spending?
Senator Kennedy expressed concern about spending a large amount of taxpayer money, between $200 million and $250 million, on advertising when the government is facing budget challenges and fighting over funding cuts.
Q: What were the DHS ads about and who was featured in them?
The ads funded by the contract featured Secretary Kristi Noem, with some images filmed at Mount Rushmore. The focus of the ads and the process of awarding the contract are now being closely examined.