A federal judge has cleared away the bulk of actor Blake Lively's lawsuit against Justin Baldoni, dismissing 10 out of 13 claims, including those centered on sexual harassment, defamation, and conspiracy. The ruling, issued by U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman, significantly narrows the scope of the legal battle, with only allegations concerning retaliation, aiding and abetting retaliation, and breach of contract slated to proceed to trial.

"Blake Lively said that she is 'grateful' for the judge's ruling as she reacted to her sexual harassment claims against Justin Baldoni being tossed out this week amid their legal battle."
Lively, through her legal team, stated she remains focused on the retaliation aspect of the case. Her team has framed the lawsuit's core as an attempt to expose and combat "vicious forms of online retaliation" following her efforts to ensure a safe working environment.

The Case Before the Judge
The legal entanglement stems from claims Lively made against Baldoni, her co-star and director on the film It Ends With Us. While most of Lively's claims were dismissed, Judge Liman's ruling indicates that Lively may still pursue retaliation-related claims against Wayfarer Studios, Baldoni's production company, and The Agency Group PR LLC, which Lively accused of orchestrating an online smear campaign.
Read More: Bloodhounds Season 2 Ending: Geon-woo Fights Baek-jeong in Finale

Baldoni has consistently denied Lively's allegations. The judge's decision did not rule on the merits of the dismissed sexual harassment claims.

Lively's Response and Future Steps
Following the judge's decision, Lively took to social media, expressing gratitude for the ruling and condemning the "online abuse" she has endured. She indicated that her decision to pursue legal action was a response to "persuasive retaliation" faced after requesting a safer work environment.
"The physical pain from digital violence is very real," Lively stated, urging others to speak up.
A trial is scheduled to commence on May 18, with the proceedings now primarily centered on Lively's assertions of retaliation and defamation.
Background: A Legal Scrutiny
The lawsuit initially included claims of sexual harassment and a hostile work environment. However, Judge Liman cited jurisdictional issues in dismissing the sexual harassment claims, noting that the alleged misconduct did not occur within California, despite Lively suing under its laws. The dismissal of these claims has reshaped the narrative, shifting the focus to alleged retaliatory actions taken against Lively after she voiced concerns. The case has also brought to light private messages between Lively and other notable figures, including Taylor Swift and Ben Affleck.
Read More: Alabama Guard Aden Holloway May Play Next Season After Campus Ban Lifted