Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has forcefully stated his opposition to the expanding role of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank in climate-related initiatives, advocating instead for a return to their core economic missions and a greater emphasis on fossil fuel investments.
On Wednesday, April 23, 2025, Bessent, appointed by President Trump, delivered a sharp critique of the IMF and World Bank during their spring meetings. He argued that the IMF has strayed from its fundamental purpose of promoting global monetary cooperation and financial stability, now dedicating "disproportionate time and resources" to climate change, gender, and social issues. These, he asserted, are not within the IMF's original mandate.
Bessent specifically called out the World Bank for employing "vapid, buzzword-centric marketing" and urged it to prioritize investments that increase energy access in developing countries. He stressed the need for technologies that "sustain economic growth rather than seek to meet distortionary climate finance targets." His remarks, delivered in a speech and later in a briefing with reporters, were not a surprise to IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva and World Bank President Ajay Banga, with whom he had met. Bessent indicated that their confidence in the administration would hinge on their future actions.
Read More: US Private Credit Funds Face Investor Exit Rush Since 2025 Due to Defaults
Critique of "Woke" Agendas and "Mission Creep"
The Treasury Secretary framed the institutions' expanded focus on social and environmental issues as "mission creep," aligning with President Trump's characterization of such agendas as "woke." He questioned the economic toll and cause of climate change, suggesting a need to re-evaluate the institutions' priorities. This stance contrasts with recent academic findings suggesting significant, and potentially underestimated, economic costs associated with rising global temperatures. A study published on April 1, 2025, by Climate Fact Checks, indicated that conventional models may overlook critical flaws in assessing climate change's economic impact. Similarly, research from August 26, 2024, by Harvard Gazette, revised projections of climate change's economic toll to be "six times larger than previous estimates," with each 1°C rise potentially leading to a 12 percent decline in global GDP. A meta-analysis from February 1, 2024, on ScienceDirect also pointed to more negative and uncertain impacts of climate change.
Read More: March Food Prices Jump 2.4% Due to West Asia Conflict and Energy Costs
Emphasis on Fossil Fuels and Economic Development
Bessent's directive to the World Bank included a push to support investments in fossil fuels, such as gas-based energy production, as a means to foster economic growth and reduce poverty in developing nations. This call comes as the Trump administration has previously shown skepticism towards policies aimed at reducing fossil fuel reliance. He lauded the World Bank's recent moves to remove restrictions on nuclear energy support, viewing it as a step toward enabling economic expansion.
Broader Economic and Trade Context
Bessent's criticisms of the IMF and World Bank were delivered shortly after the IMF lowered its growth forecast for the U.S. economy. However, Bessent dismissed concerns about this revised outlook. The Treasury Secretary also touched upon trade relations, particularly with China, noting an "opportunity for a big deal" but reinforcing the administration's stance on tariffs. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt affirmed on Wednesday, April 23, 2025, that there would be "no unilateral reduction in tariffs against China," emphasizing that China must negotiate a deal with the U.S.
Read More: Anthropic's Mythos AI helps banks find security flaws in April 2026
Background and Previous Stances
Scott Bessent's appointment as Treasury Secretary by President-elect Trump in December 2024 signaled a potential shift in economic policy. Bessent had previously described the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) as a "doomsday machine for the budget," particularly its climate and energy provisions, suggesting his administration would seek to rein in such spending. His current position aligns with a broader critique of global financial institutions' perceived overreach into non-economic matters and a preference for policies that prioritize traditional economic growth drivers. Reports from April 23, 2025, also highlighted criticisms of the World Bank's travel policies, with allegations of lavish spending by its officials while lecturing developing nations.
