A recent report indicates that the National Security Agency (NSA) intercepted a phone call involving foreign intelligence operatives. The call's content reportedly centered on an individual closely associated with former President Donald Trump. Details of this interception emerged through a whistleblower's attorney.
The matter came to light when an attorney for a whistleblower, Mr. Bakaj, stated that the NSA had flagged a call. This call, according to his briefing, involved two individuals connected to foreign intelligence. Their discussion apparently focused on a person known to be close to Donald Trump. Following this disclosure, further information suggested that a public official, identified as Tulsi Gabbard, intervened.
Timeline and Key Events
The sequence of events leading to this disclosure involves several key stages:
NSA Interception: The NSA detected a phone call between two individuals identified as being part of foreign intelligence operations.
Call Content: The subject of this conversation was reportedly an individual linked to former President Trump.
Whistleblower's Attorney Disclosure: Mr. Bakaj, acting as the attorney for a whistleblower, revealed the details of this intercepted call. He was reportedly briefed on its sensitive nature.
Intervention by Public Official: Tulsi Gabbard, described as having an office that received intelligence reports, instructed the NSA not to publish the details of this specific report.
Redaction and Direct Transmission: Gabbard's office is alleged to have redacted significant portions of a complaint that was later shared with intelligence committee members. The classified details of the intercepted call were instead directed to be sent straight to her office.
Evidence and Intersecting Accounts
The primary source of information regarding the NSA's detection and subsequent events stems from statements made by Mr. Bakaj, the attorney for a whistleblower.
Read More: Rep. Chuy García Speaks Out on Epstein Files, Long Chicago Career
"The National Security Agency (NSA) flagged an unusual phone call between two members of foreign intelligence, who discussed a person close to Donald Trump, according to a whistleblower’s attorney who was briefed on details of the call."
This account presents the core assertion of foreign intelligence activity and its focus on an associate of the former president.
Further complicating the narrative, reports indicate an action taken by Tulsi Gabbard:
"One day after meeting Wiles, Gabbard told the NSA not to publish the intelligence report."
This suggests a deliberate effort to control the dissemination of the intercepted information. The claim regarding redactions and direct transmission adds another layer to this assertion:
"Bakaj, the whistleblower’s attorney, said that Gabbard’s office had redacted much of the complaint that was released to intelligence committee members on Tuesday, citing executive privilege. Instead, she instructed NSA officials to transmit the highly classified details directly to her office, Bakaj said."
Read More: Hong Kong Father Convicted in Security Law Case
This implies a strategy to manage the flow of intelligence, potentially for specific purposes or to maintain a degree of confidentiality beyond standard protocols.
Circumstantial Evidence and Unanswered Questions
While the core fact of an NSA-flagged call involving foreign intelligence operatives discussing someone close to Donald Trump appears to be asserted by Mr. Bakaj, several aspects remain subject to further examination.
Nature of the "Person Close to Trump": The identity of the individual discussed in the call is not explicitly stated in the provided information. Was this person a formal advisor, a business associate, or someone else with a known connection to the former president?
Identity of Foreign Intelligence Operatives: The specific nationalities or affiliations of the two foreign intelligence members involved in the call have not been detailed. This lack of specificity makes it challenging to ascertain the broader geopolitical implications.
Motivation for Intervention: The reasons behind Tulsi Gabbard's directive to the NSA not to publish the report, and the subsequent redactions, are not fully explained. Were these actions intended to protect national security interests, shield individuals, or serve other undisclosed objectives?
Source of Whistleblower's Information: The precise origin of the whistleblower's knowledge regarding this specific NSA interception remains unarticulated. How did the whistleblower gain access to this highly classified intelligence?
Interpretation of Official Actions
The actions attributed to Tulsi Gabbard—namely, preventing the publication of an NSA intelligence report and directing classified details to her office—are notable.
Read More: Pam Bondi Questioned About Epstein Files at Government Hearing
"Gabbard told the NSA not to publish the intelligence report."
This suggests an active role in managing intelligence flow. The alleged redaction of a complaint and the direct transmission of classified details:
"Bakaj, the whistleblower’s attorney, said that Gabbard’s office had redacted much of the complaint that was released to intelligence committee members on Tuesday, citing executive privilege. Instead, she instructed NSA officials to transmit the highly classified details directly to her office, Bakaj said."
These statements, if accurate, point towards a method of information control that deviates from standard intelligence dissemination procedures. The justification of "executive privilege" for redactions indicates an attempt to assert a level of confidentiality associated with high-level government functions.
Conclusion and Implications
The reported NSA detection of a foreign intelligence phone call concerning an individual linked to former President Donald Trump, coupled with alleged interventions by Tulsi Gabbard regarding the handling of this information, presents a complex scenario. The accounts, primarily stemming from Mr. Bakaj, the whistleblower's attorney, outline a series of events involving intelligence interception, communication control, and redaction of sensitive material.
Read More: Cyberattack Stops Important Services
The core allegations—that foreign intelligence operatives discussed a person close to Trump, and that a public official then sought to limit the distribution of this intelligence—raise significant questions. These include the identity of all parties involved, the specific nature of their relationship to the former president, and the motivations behind the actions taken to manage the intelligence. The justification of executive privilege for redactions suggests an assertion of authority over the information's release.
Further investigation would be required to corroborate these accounts and fully understand the context and implications of these reported events. The unverified nature of certain details necessitates a cautious approach to definitive conclusions.
Sources
The Guardian: NSA detected foreign intelligence phone call about a person close to Trump
Published: 20 hours ago
Link: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/07/nsa-foreign-intelligence-trump-whistleblower
Context: Article provides details on the NSA's alleged detection of a call and the subsequent actions by Tulsi Gabbard, as reported by the whistleblower's attorney.
The Independent: NSA flagged evidence of call between Trump ally and intelligence actor: Whistleblower
Published: 14 hours ago
Link: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/nsa-trump-whistleblower-tulsi-gabbard-b2916077.html
Context: This article also reports on the NSA's flagging of a call and its connection to a whistleblower and US politics, corroborating the general subject matter with The Guardian.
Read More: FBI Search of Georgia Election Records Investigated
