THE NBA is reportedly looking into a contentious foul called against the Sacramento Kings during their recent 110-105 loss to the Golden State Warriors. The incident, a late-game foul on Warriors player Seth Curry with just over three minutes remaining, has drawn significant attention, with some observers alleging it was a deliberate act of "tanking" – intentionally losing to improve draft position. However, sources close to the Kings organization are pushing back against this interpretation, stating the foul was a simple tactical miscalculation rather than a pre-meditated move to lose.
The Kings’ camp insists the foul was a misstep by player Doug Christie, who apparently intended to call a timeout before the clock ticked below the three-minute mark, which would have automatically forfeited the ability to do so. This attempt to strategically manage timeouts, according to these sources, was fumbled when Christie misjudged the game's situation, leading to the foul. This explanation directly counters the public criticisms from Golden State’s Draymond Green, who strongly implied the Kings were engaging in tanking.

Disagreement Over Intent
Draymond Green publicly voiced his displeasure, suggesting the Kings' actions were a clear attempt to lose, and called for league action and fines. The Kings, however, maintain that the players and coaches on the floor were actively trying to win the game. This assertion is complicated by the team's current roster situation, which sees several highly paid veterans sidelined due to season-ending surgeries or inactive status for the game.
Read More: Jackie Young Signs One-Year Deal With Las Vegas Aces for $1.19 Million

Context of Injury and Youth
The Kings have been playing a significant portion of the latter part of their season without key players like Domantas Sabonis, Zach LaVine, and De'Andre Hunter, all of whom have undergone season-ending surgeries. DeMar DeRozan and Russell Westbrook were also not active for the game in question. This backdrop of an injury-depleted roster has fueled discussions about the team’s priorities, with some suggesting an organizational understanding that focusing on youth development and potentially securing a better draft position by "bottoming out" in the final weeks is a beneficial strategy.
The Incident's Amplification
The foul's impact was amplified by its timing and the subsequent commentary. Seth Curry, an accurate free-throw shooter, was sent to the line, making one of two shots and tying the game at 101. This pivotal moment, regardless of intent, shifted momentum and drew the ire of Green, who has been vocal about the perceived "tanking epidemic" in the NBA. The league's investigation, as reported, is a response to the controversy generated by this play, examining whether NBA integrity was compromised.
Read More: Aquino 2024 Top Argentine Player Struggles in Chile, Contract Ends Dec 2026
Background
The NBA's rules and the competitive nature of the league often lead to scrutiny of teams' late-season performances, particularly those not in playoff contention. The focus on draft order and player development can create a perceived conflict between the desire to win individual games and the long-term strategic goals of an organization. The incident involving the Sacramento Kings and their late foul has become a focal point for these ongoing debates about competitive balance and the motivations behind team decisions.