Mets Owner Steve Cohen Says No Captain Will Ever Be Named

Steve Cohen, the owner of the New York Mets, has said that the team will not have a captain while he is in charge. He believes leadership should come from the players themselves, not from a special title.
By Newsroom | Sports, New York |

A Definitive Stance on Leadership Roles

New York Mets owner Steve Cohen has definitively stated that the team will never name a captain for as long as he owns the club. This declaration brings an abrupt end to widespread speculation, particularly regarding Francisco Lindor, who had been considered a potential candidate. Cohen’s remarks suggest a preference for organic leadership to emerge from within the locker room, rather than a formally designated title.

Background: The Evolving Captaincy Discussion

The question of a team captain for the Mets has resurfaced periodically, especially following the retirement of David Wright, the franchise's last captain. Recent reports and discussions had suggested the possibility of Francisco Lindor assuming this role, fueling considerable fan and media interest.

  • The Mets have not had a designated captain since David Wright concluded his career eight years prior to Cohen's recent statement.

  • A video acknowledging past captains, which notably featured Lindor before Wright's retirement ceremony, was published by the organization, intensifying the captaincy speculation.

  • Sources indicate that prior to Cohen's statement, multiple players expressed interest in the captaincy role last year.

  • The team's management had reportedly discussed the idea of naming a captain last spring.

Owner's Directives on Leadership

Steve Cohen has articulated a clear vision for leadership within the Mets clubhouse, emphasizing that a formal captaincy will not be a feature of his tenure.

Read More: Backyard Baseball 2026: New Game Coming to PC and Consoles in July

"There will never be a team captain as long as he owns Mets." - Article 1

"I will never name a captain as long as I'm in charge." - Article 2

"The New York Mets ‘will never’ name a team captain under owner Steve Cohen." - Article 3

"Mets will ‘never’ have a team captain as long as I’m owner." - Article 4

"I’ll never have a captain in charge of that scene." - Article 5

"The New York Mets won’t be naming a captain anytime soon—and if Steve Cohen has his way, they won’t be naming one at all." - Article 6

A Rejection of Traditional Structure

Cohen's stance appears to move away from the established tradition of appointing a captain.

  • He stated, "My view is, the locker room is unique and let the locker room sort it out year-in, year-out.” This suggests a belief that leadership should naturally evolve among players.

  • The owner also commented, "No matter what you do it doesn't mean you're necessarily going to win the World Series." This implies that a captaincy title is not viewed as a guaranteed path to success.

  • Cohen has indicated a lack of interest in "symbolism," suggesting his focus is on practical team dynamics rather than symbolic roles.

Leadership Without a Designated Title

While foregoing a captain, the organization is still focused on fostering leadership.

  • Manager Carlos Mendoza has stated he did not need to discuss the captaincy decision with Lindor, implying it was an organizational directive rather than a player-specific matter.

  • Cohen expressed his belief that "you need to have not only one guy, but a few guys" in leadership roles, hinting at a distributed leadership model.

  • The team is actively working to "build something resembling a new leadership group."

Historical Context of Mets Captaincy

The Mets have a limited history of officially naming team captains.

CaptainTenure (Approximate)
Keith Hernandez1980s
Gary Carter1980s
John Franco1990s
David Wright2010s

  • Cohen's decision marks a significant departure from the franchise's past practices, as only four players have held the title of captain in the team's history.

Contrasting Views on Leadership

Cohen's perspective appears to differ from notions that a captain provides essential structure.

  • The owner's decision aligns with "how this front office operates" from a roster construction viewpoint.

  • His comments suggest that leadership should emerge organically, with players stepping up based on merit and influence within the team.

  • Was there any consideration given to how a lack of a formal captain might impact player dynamics or accountability?

  • The removal of a video that had seemingly foreshadowed Lindor as captain, coupled with the explicit statement of no future captaincy, indicates a firm and decisive change in organizational philosophy.

Analysis of Cohen's Strategy

Steve Cohen's pronouncement signifies a clear strategic direction for the Mets' internal culture. By eschewing the traditional captaincy, he is opting for a model where leadership is fluid and player-driven. This approach could potentially empower a broader range of players to assert themselves and contribute to team cohesion.

However, it also raises questions about how accountability and on-field guidance will be maintained without a designated leader. Cohen himself acknowledges the challenge, stating, "It's on me and our coaches to take a lot off his plate," which seems to imply the weight of leadership responsibility will fall more heavily on the coaching staff and a dispersed group of veteran players.

Read More: Hillary Clinton Tells US House Committee on 26 February 2026 She Never Met Jeffrey Epstein

Conclusion and Implications

Steve Cohen's firm declaration that the New York Mets will never name a team captain during his ownership is a significant organizational decision. This policy diverges from franchise history and ends speculation surrounding potential candidates like Francisco Lindor. The owner's stated preference is for leadership to develop organically within the locker room, a model he believes is more conducive to team success than a symbolic title.

  • The move suggests a commitment to a less hierarchical, more distributed leadership structure.

  • It places a greater onus on the coaching staff and veteran players to foster accountability and guide the team.

  • The team's recent roster changes, including trades and free agent signings, are part of this broader initiative to reshape the clubhouse dynamic.

  • While Cohen emphasizes this approach is unique, his stance aims to empower players to define their own leadership roles within the team.

Sources

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Will the Mets have a captain soon?
No, the owner Steve Cohen said there will never be a captain while he owns the team.
Q: Why is Steve Cohen not naming a captain?
He wants players to become leaders on their own. He thinks a title is not needed for success.
Q: Who was the last Mets captain?
David Wright was the last captain for the Mets. He stopped playing many years ago.
Q: Does this mean Francisco Lindor cannot be a leader?
No, Cohen believes many players should be leaders. Lindor can still be a leader without the title of captain.