New York City was awash in a spectacle of fabric and fanfare yesterday, as the Metropolitan Museum of Art hosted its annual fundraising gala. This year's event, themed "Fashion is Art," saw celebrities don ensembles that ranged from subtle nods to artistic movements to outright declarations of sartorial intent. The gala, a crucial fundraiser for the museum's Costume Institute, reportedly raised a record $42 million, surpassing last year's $31 million haul. Organizers urged attendees to "express their own relationship to fashion as an embodied art form," a directive met with a diverse array of interpretations on the red carpet.
As per a press release, "Guests are invited to 'express their own relationship to fashion as an embodied art form and celebrate the countless depictions of the dressed body throughout art history.'"
This year's gala, co-chaired by Beyoncé, Nicole Kidman, Venus Williams, and Anna Wintour, became a stage for both opulent displays and subtle critiques. The event, often dubbed the "Super Bowl of fashion," unfolded against a backdrop designed to evoke Monet's gardens, with romantic florals and lush greenery.
Read More: Met Gala 2026: Revealing Outfits Cause Debate
Notable Appearances and Fashion Statements
Several prominent figures commanded attention. Beyoncé made a notable return, gracing the red carpet with her daughter, Blue Ivy Carter, who made her Met Gala debut. Gigi Hadid was noted for her reinvention of the "naked dress." Elsewhere, Sarah Paulson sported a mask fashioned from dollar bills, a potentially pointed accessory given the event's significant fundraising aims.
Other attendees included:
Rihanna and A$AP Rocky
Russell Wilson and Ciara
Sabrina Carpenter, whose attire reportedly contained a subtle tribute to her name, and who was observed with her hands strategically placed to obscure potential engagement ring speculation.
Hudson Williams, noted for his fashion presence.
Lila Moss, daughter of Kate Moss, appeared in a cream gown.
Coco Jones, who wore a tulle gown.
Gracie Abrams, seen in a gold Chanel dress.
Rosie Huntington-Whiteley
Gabrielle Union
Connor Storrie, whose ensemble included a halter top and a contrasting dress slacks.
Jeremy Pope, singled out for his physicality and fashion.
Hugh Jackman and Sutton Foster.
Stanley Tucci, Felicity Blunt, and Emily Blunt.
John Legend and Chrissy Teigen (though not explicitly mentioned in summaries, common attendees).
Emma Chamberlain, noted for her signature pixie cut.
Nicole Kidman was accompanied by her daughter, Sunday Rose.
Katy Perry, who reportedly channeled a past Kim Kardashian Met Gala look.
Dwayne Johnson and Lauren Hashian.
Adrien Brody and Georgina Chapman.
Amanda Seyfried.
Venus Williams and Andrea Preti.
Chase Sui Wonders.
Greta Gerwig and Stella McCartney.
Donatella Versace.
Ben Stiller and Christine Taylor.
Paul Anthony Kelly.
Russell Westbrook.
Daisy Edgar-Jones.
Olivier Rousteing.
Ayesha and Steph Curry.
Cara Delevingne.
Elizabeth Debicki.
Rebecca Hall and Morgan Spector.
Suki Waterhouse.
Tom Sturridge and Alexa Chung.
Vittoria Ceretti.
Lauren Sánchez Bezos, alongside Jeff Bezos, whose presence, along with that of other prominent donors, allegedly sparked protests and calls for boycotts.
Paloma Elsesser.
Hero Fiennes Tiffin.
Undercurrents of Discontent
Beyond the dazzling displays, the event was not without its discordant notes. Reports indicate that the gala's fundraising, spearheaded by donors like Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez Bezos, was met with protests and calls for boycotts. This undercurrent of dissent suggests a tension between the celebratory facade of the event and broader societal critiques, particularly concerning the source of its considerable wealth. The presence of a protest at the museum's steps, though quickly subdued, served as a visible reminder of these external pressures.
Read More: Met Gala 2026: Stars Absent, Theme Confusing
The theme itself, "Fashion is Art," offered a broad canvas for interpretation. Some attendees drew direct inspiration from art history, while others presented more abstract or theatrical interpretations. This openness, while allowing for creative expression, also led to a wide spectrum of sartorial statements, from the understated to the ostentatious.
