The Trump Justice Department has initiated a process to reinstate federal gun rights for individuals with felony convictions. This move, which has drawn both support from gun rights advocates and criticism from gun control groups, is being implemented through a revived statutory provision allowing individuals to petition for the return of their Second Amendment privileges. The department is developing a 'web portal' to manage these applications, aiming for efficiency and minimizing manual review.
Several individuals have already had their federal gun rights restored. Among them is Mel Gibson, identified as an alleged fake elector. Another recipient is John Mastrangelo, who, when asked about his situation, stated he has taken responsibility for his crime and, as a landlord, provides second chances to those with convictions. The department has announced these restorations with little initial explanation or public fanfare.
Read More: NACC finds serious corrupt conduct in Robodebt but no criminal charges for officials
Revival of a Dormant Process
The Justice Department is reviving a long-dormant process under 18 U.S.C. § 925(c). This statute empowers the Attorney General to grant relief from federal firearm prohibitions to individuals if they are deemed unlikely to act in a manner dangerous to public safety. President Trump reportedly directed the department to address perceived infringements on Second Amendment rights. The ultimate decision to grant relief rests with the Attorney General, who will review each case individually, considering all available facts and evidence. Violent felons, registered sex offenders, and illegal aliens will generally remain ineligible unless extraordinary circumstances exist.
Arguments and Criticisms
Proponents of this initiative, such as attorneys for Gun Owners of America, argue that federal prohibitions are overly broad and that individuals should have their rights restored if they are not deemed a risk. They see this as an overdue recalibration of federal policy. Conversely, gun control organizations, including Brady, express strong opposition, suggesting the administration is acting prematurely and without completing the necessary rulemaking process. Some Democratic lawmakers have asserted that this move violates congressional prohibitions on funding for such programs and disregards the issue of gun violence.
Read More: Victorian Mother Uses Legal Order to Stop Schoolgirl Talking About Harassment
Legal and Procedural Questions
The revival of this program has also raised legal and procedural questions. Congressional Democrats have argued that the department's decision to restore gun rights to certain individuals, including alleged fake electors and individuals like Mel Gibson, violates existing law. Specifically, they cite concerns that the authority for restoration has been moved from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to the Attorney General, potentially contravening the separation of powers and a decades-old provision in the DOJ's annual funding bill. Questions also persist regarding how the DOJ will analyze requests and the precise criteria for determining who is not a risk. The Justice Department has proposed a rule regarding the exercise of the Attorney General's authority, which has been submitted for review.
Read More: Erika Kirk Joins Air Force Academy Board After Husband's Death
Background
Historically, the restoration program became a politically contentious issue, leading to its dormancy. The restoration of gun rights for convicted felons is a complex matter, with federal law prohibiting certain individuals, such as those sentenced to more than a year in prison, from possessing firearms. The Supreme Court has acknowledged that certain dangers, like domestic abuse with a firearm, serve as limitations on Second Amendment rights. While the Trump administration frames this as a corrective measure, critics view it as potentially enabling further gun violence.