Box Hill North Players Get Suspensions After Party Photos

By Newsroom | Sports, Australia |

Concerns have been raised about the fairness of penalties given to players from the Box Hill North Football Club following an inappropriate post-season party. The penalties, issued by the Victorian Amateur Football Association (VAFA), are viewed by some as too light, leading to widespread discussion about the league's commitment to its stated values.

Background of the Incident and Investigation

The events leading to the player sanctions began after a post-season party. Photos from this event were shared on social media.

  • Initial Complaint: Genna Krienke, a former captain of the women's team, brought the inappropriate photos to the attention of the club.

  • Club Inaction: According to Krienke, the club did not act on the issue for four months.

  • Media Involvement: The situation escalated and became public after media outlets became involved.

  • VAFA Notification: The VAFA stated the matter was first brought to their attention on January 1, 2026.

  • Investigation Launched: The VAFA appointed an independent investigator and stated their commitment to a full investigation, seeking the club committee's support and disclosure. During this period, the VAFA indicated they would make no further public comments.

  • Cooperation: The VAFA later announced that the club and all witnesses cooperated fully with the investigation.

Player Sanctions and VAFA's Response

The VAFA investigation concluded that four players had breached the National Community Football Policy General Code of Conduct and the VAFA Social Media Policy. The penalties issued were as follows:

Read More: Seton Hall's NCAA Tournament Chances Getting Smaller

  • Players Posting Photos: Two players, identified as those who posted the photos to social media, received a three-week suspension.

  • Players in Photos: Two other players who were present in the photos received a two-week ban.

  • Cooperation Acknowledged: The league noted that all players involved pleaded guilty and cooperated fully with the investigation.

  • Leadership Role Review: All four players have been stood down from any leadership roles within the club. They will only be reinstated after completing appropriate education sessions, after which their positions will be reviewed.

"The Club and all witnesses cooperated fully with the investigation, which found that four players breached the National Community Football Policy General Code of Conduct and the VAFA Social Media Policy. The VAFA and the Club have also confirmed the following undertakings: Players in leadership roles will be stood down until they complete appropriate education sessions, after which their positions will be reviewed." - VAFA Statement, January 2026

Criticisms of the Sanctions

The penalties have drawn criticism for being insufficient, with some describing them as a "slap on the wrist."

Read More: Australian Senator's Remarks About Parliament Investigated

  • Lenient Penalties: Genna Krienke characterized the sanctions as "extremely lenient."

  • Delayed Action: The initial four-month delay by the club in addressing the issue before media involvement has also been a point of concern.

  • League Values: Critics question whether these sanctions align with the VAFA's stated commitment to "upholding its values of respect, inclusion, community and integrity."

"The VAFA remains committed to upholding its values of respect, inclusion, community and integrity, and to educating all members in support of these principles." - VAFA Statement, January 2026

Expert Analysis and Community Reaction

The incident and subsequent sanctions have sparked a wider conversation about accountability within sporting organizations. While specific expert analyses were not directly available in the provided data, the reported sentiment suggests a public expectation for stronger repercussions in cases of misconduct that challenge community standards. The VAFA's emphasis on future education aims to address underlying behavioral issues, but the immediate impact of the sanctions on perceptions of fairness remains a subject of debate.

Conclusion and Future Implications

The sanctions against the Box Hill North players represent a disciplinary action taken by the VAFA in response to inappropriate social media conduct. The punishments, ranging from two to three weeks suspension and removal from leadership roles pending further education, have been met with dissatisfaction by some who perceive them as inadequate.

Read More: Quebec Athletes Do Well at Winter Games; City May Host Future Olympics

  • Accountability: The VAFA has issued sanctions, acknowledging player cooperation.

  • Future Conduct: The requirement for educational sessions aims to prevent future breaches of conduct.

  • Public Perception: The public reaction suggests a continued focus on how sporting bodies handle sensitive issues of player behavior and uphold their stated values.

The club and the VAFA's next steps will likely involve monitoring the completion of the educational programs and the players' future conduct, while the broader community will continue to observe how such incidents are managed to ensure consistent application of rules and a commitment to respect and inclusion.

Read More: Hawthorn and Geelong Play Practice Game

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Why were the players suspended?
Players shared inappropriate photos from a party on social media. This broke the rules.
Q: What happened to the players?
Four players were suspended for two or three weeks. They also lost leadership jobs at the club for now.
Q: Are the punishments fair?
Some people think the punishments are too light. The league says they are working to teach players about good behavior.
Q: Did the club know about the photos?
A former player told the club about the photos, but it took four months for action to be taken.