The Australian Football League (AFL) finds itself ensnared in a growing controversy, with a significant portion of its fanbase decrying the relentless intrusion of music and amplified sounds during matches. This sonic saturation, particularly after every goal and during breaks, is perceived by many as actively eroding the natural atmosphere that defines Australian Rules Football, transforming hallowed grounds into cacophonous arenas that alienate dedicated supporters.
Key points of contention revolve around the AFL's persistent use of music and amplified sound effects during games, particularly following goals and during breaks in play. This practice is widely criticized by fans for drowning out the organic crowd noise and disrupting the natural flow and emotional build-up of matches.
Reports from across recent years highlight a consistent sentiment: the loud, often jarring, musical interludes are seen as actively ruining the atmosphere that many fans cherish. From the 'Pocket' newsletter noting the presence of "a lot of music. A lot of flashing lights" to The Roar's blunt assertion that "playing music after every single goal is ruining the atmosphere, not enhancing it," the message is clear – the sonic landscape of the game is becoming overbearing.
Read More: Suns vs Blazers NBA Play-In Game Broadcast Details Not Fully Clear
Grand Final Groans
The most fervent objections often surface during high-stakes matches, notably the Grand Final. In 2025, the decision to incorporate player-nominated songs, featuring artists like John Denver and Kenny Rogers, following goals at the MCG was met with widespread fan outrage. This move was widely described as "cringeworthy" and led to supporters venting their fury on social media platforms.
Mitch Cleary, an AFL reporter for Channel 7, noted the public reaction on X (formerly Twitter).
Former North Melbourne player Corey McKernan succinctly questioned the decision with a simple "why."
Feedback to media outlets like Triple M was equally "scathing," with many urging the AFL to "Let the crowd set the tone, not the players' favourite songs."
Echoes of Discontent
This isn't a new phenomenon. As far back as 2022, articles from The Roar and the Daily Mail detailed similar fan backlashes. After a preliminary final at the MCG, fans labelled the experience "horrendous" and the "worst place on earth" due to the "continuous blasting of loud music." Concerns were raised about music played between goals, during breaks, and before/after games, with specific mention of songs like Tom Jones’ ‘What’s New Pussycat?’ being played after a goal. The criticism extended to the experience for those watching at home, who couldn't escape the sonic bombardment.
Read More: AFL Young Stars Face Rough Play Amid Rising Player Salaries in 2025
"Why would you drown out the unique sight and sound of #AFL fans in full flight after a goal?" — A fan's query from 2022, capturing the core of the issue.
The Deeper Disconnect
Beyond the immediate auditory assault, the underlying sentiment from some critics is that the AFL is losing touch with its core appeal. Articles from as early as 2015, like one in The Age titled "AFL: Loud music, spruiking silence football fans," and another in the SMH, "How the AFL is killing footy for the fans," suggest a broader trend of prioritizing external "entertainment" over the intrinsic drama of the game itself. The argument is that the game's inherent drama, particularly its spectacle on the large grounds, is being overshadowed and diminished by these added layers of engineered sound and visual distraction. The focus, it seems, is shifting from the raw, unscripted emotion of the crowd to a more curated, almost concert-like experience that some fans feel is fundamentally at odds with the sport's identity.
Read More: Ben Woolliss fights Petchfergus on Sky Sports May 16 after quick win
