Senior RSS functionary Sunil Ambekar has asserted that practices like offering prayers on public roads are not permitted even in countries with Muslim majorities. This framing, made in response to queries about FIRs lodged for such activities in India, positions restrictions on public religious observance as a matter of general order rather than specifically targeting any community. The comments, made during an interview published on March 22, 2026, aim to normalize the application of existing regulations to prayer gatherings.
Law and Order Versus Communal Concern
Ambekar’s remarks appear to directly address recent events where authorities have taken action against individuals offering Namaz on streets. He suggested that such occurrences, alongside other religious observances like Iftar on boats or temple-specific affidavits, do not necessarily undermine the RSS’s message of "unity in diversity." The RSS leader’s stance implies that any perceived impact on unity is secondary to the adherence to established laws.
Read More: Facebook Religious vs Atheist Debates: What is Proof?
"In a democracy, if people feel these arrangements are not right, they can voice their opinion. We have media to raise our voice."
This statement acknowledges the right to dissent within the democratic structure, while simultaneously redirecting attention to the constitutional framework and its enforcement. The comparison to Muslim-majority nations serves to contextualize these measures as standard practice, rather than an exceptional imposition.
Broader Political Context
The interview also touched upon other political and national issues. Ambekar advocated for opposition parties to prioritize "national interest" and support the government during the ongoing West Asia conflict. He also defended government initiatives like the SocioEconomic and Caste Census (SECC), the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), and the National Register of Citizens (NRC) as constitutionally sound processes designed to safeguard national interests.
Ambekar also addressed internal party matters, specifically the appointment of Nitin Nabin as BJP chief despite his limited prior affiliation with the RSS. Ambekar expressed confidence in the BJP’s ability to instill its core ideology within its leaders.
Read More: Pawan Kalyan Asks Government To Help Judges With Too Many Cases
Historical Echoes and Societal Shifts
The RSS leader invoked the historical partition of India, drawing parallels to situations like Lebanon, to explain societal divisions arising from altered traditions. This historical framing suggests that unresolved grievances stemming from perceived cultural or traditional disruptions can lead to significant national fragmentation. The implication is that maintaining public order and preventing the perceived alteration of traditions are crucial for national cohesion.
